I have everyone in that one. ! Thank you very much! Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you.
TL;DR
The January 17, 2024 City Council meeting approved a broad slate of policy actions—including suspending the inclusionary housing ordinance, adopting gun‑dealer licensing and preferential parking ordinances, extending the meeting, and appointing council members to regional bodies—while directing staff to pursue further research on housing, transportation, and commission oversight.
- Council moves agenda items 2B and 5B to consent calendar/old business [11:54]11:54
- Public‑works presentation on protected bike lanes for Potrero Grande Drive [12:58]12:58
- LAMP Optimist Club scholarship contest presentation [16:58]16:58
- City Manager announces new librarian, assistant city manager, and interim fire chief appointments [22:00]22:00
- Fire Chief Matt Hallock honored and farewell announced [28:55]28:55
- Staff presentation on Garvey Reservoir improvements and multilingual notices [70:15]70:15
- Resiliency Center presentation on trauma services and future location plans [77:02]77:02
- IHO feasibility study presentation by EPS; discussion of market conditions [115:49]115:49
- Motion to suspend IHO for 12 months carried unanimously [171:47]171:47
- Transportation staff presentation on Garvey Avenue, Atlantic & Garfield Avenues, Monterey Pass Road [189:11]189:11
- Motion to adopt sidewalk widening and climate‑friendly materials on Garvey Avenue approved [205:09]205:09
- Motion to suspend Sister Cities Commission and form ad‑hoc committee approved [254:08]254:08
- Motion to adopt Ordinance No. 2243 (gun‑dealer licensing) approved [267:41]267:41
- Motion to adopt Resolution No. 2024‑R3 (E. Hellman parking district) approved [268:37]268:37
Summary
We haven't generated a summary for this meeting yet.
Transcript
Good evening and welcome to the Monterey Park City Council meeting. I want to go ahead and get us started here. I want to start by reading the mission statement. Well, first of all, by welcoming you here tonight and for taking the time to be here tonight.
Recording in progress.
I want to go ahead and start off by reading our mission statement. It is the mission of the city of Monterey Park to provide excellent services to enhance the quality of life for our entire community. And I also want to take this time to read our land acknowledgement. We would like to acknowledge that the land we inhabit today was once known as the Tom Van Gar, the home of the Gabriolino Tongva people.
We show our respect to the Gabriolino Tongva people, as well as all Indigenous people past, present, and future, and honor their labor as original caretakers of this land.
We commit to uplifting the Gabriolino Tongva people and invite you to acknowledge their history and join us in caring for this land.
I want to also share and just acknowledge my daughter who's sitting here next to me here tonight
because it relates to the next item which we're doing. It has been this past year one of the goals of our city council to promote civic engagement among our youth. We know that part of creating a vibrant and participatory democracy within our country is ensuring that our youth are not just part of our process but also involved. And that this be not just a one-time deal but a lifelong process. And so I invited my family here today. My daughter, Dolly, who's up here. My daughter, Mia, who's sitting in the audience of Wave Mia.
and my other daughter, Bella, who's up there,
along with my wife, Natalie, who's a teacher here in Monterey Park at Mark Keppel High School. Thank you for being here tonight. I want to go ahead and get us started with our flag salute,
so if I can ask you to please stand.
And I'd like to invite the Monterey Park Police Explorers
to please join us. okay okay
okay okay okay
okay okay okay okay okay okay okay okay
okay okay okay okay okay okay
I'd like to at this time invite Mia Sanchez, who is a first grader from Brightwood Elementary School, who will lead us in the Pledge of Allegiance.
Put your right hand over your heart. Ready, begin.
I pledge allegiance to the flag of the United States of America and to the republic for
which it stands, one nation, under God, indivisible, with liberty and justice for all. Please be seated. Please be seated.
Please be seated. ������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������� Post-pulls.
Uh-oh, please. Dismiss.
At this point, I'd like to invite the city council to join me up in the front to present a certificate for Mia and her family.
Thank you.
Mia, thank you so much for meeting us, so much for meeting us in the flag saloon today. You made your daddy very proud today, and your mommy, and your sisters, and your whole family.
So on behalf of the City of La Harae Park and the City Council, we'd like to present you
with this certificate and acknowledge you as a civic superstar. Congratulations. Let's give her a round of applause.
Thank you very much.
very much very much very much very much very very very
City Clerk, if we can do a roll call, please.
Council Member Lo.
Present.
Council Member Yu. Here. Council Member Ngo.
Present. Mayor Pro Tem Wong. Present. Mayor Sanchez. Mayor Sanchez. Here. We've got our call. Thank you so much.
And city attorney, city manager, do we have any agenda additions, deletions, or changes?
One for me.
Mr. Mayor, I ask to move item 2B to the consent calendar.
Item 2B to the consent calendar.
And Mr. Mayor, members of the city council, there is a request also to move item 5B. to be heard after old business but before the consent calendar, if that's okay with council, as we have speakers in the audience for this item.
Okay, thank you.
Any objections?
If not, we'll consider the items moved and the agenda adjusted.
And we will move to
public communication.
Our speaker, Hyrule Alvarez.
Thank you. Can everyone hear me?
Hi, everyone. I hope you're all doing well, and thank you for the opportunity to speak. So I'm here to ask city council to protect the bicyclists and pedestrians of Potrero Grande Drive here in Monterey Park. So there are two public works projects that are coming up this year that can ensure that, you know, anyone that's biking or walking down the street will be safe and connected to the rest of the city. So if you haven't been on Potrero recently, you know, it's still not much has changed. Right. It's still a massive, you know, wide road with lots of cars that drive dangerously fast. on it. And just a few months ago, you know, a number of people tragically died on Potrero. And every day I see lots of people with kids or just folks walking and biking next to 60 plus mile an hour traffic, you know, with nothing separating them. And so there's two capital improvement projects, MATCYCLE 1, Potrero Grande Regional Project, and Potrero Grande Renovation, CIP 96038 and 96012 that are going to kick off this year. And I'm asking all of you to please make sure that those two projects together create fully protected bicycle lanes on Potrero Grande, not with paint, not with plastic, but actual real physical protection, you know, like planters, concrete, or metal bollards, or just barriers that will prevent cars from even having the opportunity to, you know, crash into families that are, you know, just enjoying a walk together or people that are biking to work. And by protecting Potrero, we can create a connection between all of the people. Excuse me, sorry. We can create a connection between all the people that are living in Southeast Monterey Park and all of our amazing local businesses on Garfield and beyond. And by protecting Potrero, we're going to help reduce our carbon footprint because more people will feel safe and want to bike along the street. And just simply by protecting Potrero, will make Monterey Park a better city. And so the last time that I checked with Public Works... Director of Public Works. Council Member. I was told that a request for proposal was going to be sent out soon for those two capital improvement projects. So there is still time for City Council to work with Public Works to make sure you know that these two projects will incorporate fully protected bicycle lanes on Potrero. I know that cost is always a consideration. But there are lots of ways to get Lor cost physical concrete or metal protection as well as just getting creative you know with combining the funds for both projects. um you know i i really believe that this can be done with the current budget and you know maybe uh there's other cities as well that can help um letting us bar equipment or things like that i don't know if you've seen santa monica has their own kind of concrete 3d printer maybe they're willing to lend a hand um but just you know generally council members i do ask that you please you know protect botrero we have the money and the projects kicking off to be able to do it mayor sanchez i know that you care a lot about creating a connected community and a network of bike lanes. So this would help with that. Mayor Pro Tem Wong and Council Member Yu.
This would help us get closer to our climate goals, which I know that both of you care deeply about. Council Member No, you mentioned in a debate that you grew up biking around here in this community, so you know how dangerous it can be, and I ask that you help us change that for everyone.
And Council Member Lo, you've been a long-time supporter of those who bicycle, and so protecting Potrera would help all of us tremendously. So thank you very much for your time.
And I would love to send you an email with some ideas and recommendations if possible. Thank you. Thank you. Do we have another speaker?
Next speaker, Lisa Dong and Brandon Wong.
Good evening, Mayor Jose Sanchez and city council members. My name is Lisa Duong, and I am the past president of the LAMP Optimist Club. LAMP stands for Los Angeles Monterey Park. So the LAMP Optimist Club was established in 1957. Our club's mission is to bring out the best in youth.
Over the years, we mentored and provided numerous volunteer opportunities to hundreds of students.
We also offer our local students opportunities to earn thousands of dollars in scholarships by organizing essay and oratorical contests.
The topic of this year's essay contest is optimism, how it connects us. So this contest is open to all students who are under the age of 19 as of October 2023.
The deadline to submit an entry is February 13, 2024. At the club level, we will give our medals to first, second, and third place winners. The first place winner will advance to the district level, were the first place winner and at the district level would win a $2,500 scholarship. A $2,500 scholarship. So last year, for the first time, the district also recognized and awarded second and third place winners
who happened to be two Monterey Park students, Kayla Kamei for second place and Christine Tsai for third place.
In addition to this essay contest, we also organized our annual oratorical contest. As with most local clubs, the pandemic has affected our club's resources and their ability to fundraise.
We do appreciate any donations or sponsorships so that we can continue to provide opportunities for our local students to gain valuable experience competing and to earn scholarships.
If there are any students who are interested in competing or any companies that would like to donate or sponsor, we will leave flyers at the City Hall Lobby. We will also have information and contest rules posted on our Facebook under Monterey Park Lamp Optimist Club and our Instagram page under Lamp underscore Optimist.
I would now like to introduce Brandon Vong, our student chair for the 2024 LAMP Optimist Essay Contest, to share a few words. Thank you.
Good evening, Mayor Sanchez, members of the City Council and City staff. My name is Brandon Vong, and I'm the student chair of the 2024 LAMP Optimist Club Level Essay Contest. I am also a sophomore at Marquepo High School.
In addition to the two Monterey Park students that were recognized by the Pacific Southeast Optimist District for second and third place last year, students from Mark Keppel High School
have also won first place at the district level and received the $2,500 scholarship in 2022 and 2017. This competition is an excellent opportunity to win a scholarship, and I would like to encourage students to participate. Deadline once again is on February 13, 2024. Please go to the LAMP Optimist's Facebook and Instagram page for contest rules and a link to the entry form. Thank you. Thank you so much. Next speaker, Amy Lee. City Click, did we get their contact information?
Yeah, we have it. We have their, okay, thank you.
Good evening. My name is Amy Lee, and I'm the city treasurer, but I'm also the
advisory for the Monterey Park Community Healing Fund. I just want to remind everyone that tomorrow we are having our gun violence restraining order training, so please come out
if you're interested. It's a great opportunity to see what laws are available to community members to protect themselves. So that's tomorrow. We're
going to have a Chinese interpreter available and it's also going to be videotaped, so if you can't make it tomorrow, it will be available through the city. We will have LA Superior Court Judge there, LA City
Attorney, and another person of the LA County Council. I just wanted to invite everyone and remind them that's tomorrow 6 p.m. in City Hall. Thank you very much. Thank you.
And these very chambers, right? Yes, right here. Okay. They might be in your seat.
Excellent. Thank you so much. No other speakers.
No other speakers. Okay, excellent. So we're going to go ahead and
jump to staff communications.
And we'll go ahead and start with the city manager's office.
thank you Mr. Mayor and members of the City Council
this evening just a few announcements that I would like to make I would like to take a moment to share with our community two well deserved appointments that were made over the holiday season so first if we can start with Kristen Oliveras Becerra if you can come up to the podium please Kristen has over 15 years experience in public libraries
she has previously served in various library positions
in the cities of Alhambra, Arcadia, Burbank, before coming to the Brighamire Library in 2016. Prior to her interim city librarian role, Kristen successfully led operations of the Children's Services Department, showcasing her passion for community engagement and library services. In addition to her work experience, Kristen also has a master's in library science. City Council, if you can please join me in welcoming us, Kristen Olivares Becerra, as our new city librarian. Congratulations.
Thank you so much, Kristen, for all that you're doing for our library. I know that replacing Diana Garcia is no easy task, but you've done it so wonderfully, and we're so glad and happy to have you at our library. I'd also like to invite the council to share any comments. We'll start with Council Member Lo.
Thank you, Mr. Mayor.
You know, I just want to say that our library has just had incredible momentum this past year. You know, it weathered the pandemic and still provided services. And this past year, it has been such an incredible resource for this community, especially in the aftermath of the January 21st shooting.
And we know it's because of leadership.
And so we know that momentum will continue under your leadership.
So congratulations.
Thank you very much.
I want to say congratulations. and we look forward to working closely with you.
We're proud of our library and happy to see the library has been transformed to a different entity.
We help mental health. We have different services, not only borrowing books, but we look forward to more transformations
from your leadership. Thank you. Thank you. Council Member Ngo. Christine, congratulations.
I will say that now I get double the emails, first from Diane and now from you. In any case, congratulations. well deserved and we look forward to working with you and creating our library as a resource center for the city. So anything you need from us, just let us
know. I'm going to hold you to that. Thank you.
And just
adding my voice to add congratulations, Kristen. Well deserved. As the interim
librarian, we were very proud
to see you keep the ship going and proud that you're in the permanent position now and look forward to amazing content and programs coming out of the library for months and years to come.
Thank you so much, Kristen, and we look forward to working with you in the coming years.
Thank you.
Thank you all very much.
Next, we'd like to invite up Diana Garcia, our Assistant City Manager. So Diana Garcia has had a career in public service spanning over 20 years in city and county organizations as well as nonprofits. office. Diana has been with the City since 2009, where she joined our team as a senior library clerk. Throughout the year, she has taken on positions with increased responsibilities. Diana has recently served, obviously, as the interim assistant city manager since July of 2023. She has a master's of library and information science. And Diana has definitely showed us, and she has excelled as an assistant city manager. Her experience, education, and leadership will contribute to the continued success and growth of our city. City Council, if you can please join me in congratulating Diana Garcia as our Assistant City Manager.
Congratulations, Diana.
And I've already witnessed firsthand the amazing work that you're doing to help our city move forward and also in the process of healing as we approach our one-year anniversary. But thank you so much for all the work and all the countless hours that you put in for our city. It has not gone unnoticed.
Thank you so much.
And I want to invite the other council members to join in.
Council Member Lo.
You know, I'd like to say that, you know, sometimes the universe provides when the moment is needed, and they somehow always bring the right person for the position. And I think that, you know, the universe provided,
and so we are so pleased that you are our assistant city manager.
Thank you.
Hi, Diana. I remember I first met you three years ago.
we met. You were a librarian. You're happy to be a librarian. But I do see that you have great leaderships beyond your positions.
And I wanted to say I'm proud of you. Congratulations. And the woman power, you know, we have to take on heavy duty.
So thank you. Congratulations. Thank you. Council Member Ngo? Diana, congratulations.
I'll still get more emails from you. Definitely a lot more now.
but it's well worth reading it
because you're a leader and to me you're homegrown. You've been here 15 plus years.
My daughter remembers you going to the library and saying, I remember Diana. She's the librarian that did this and we volunteered with her.
So I think we're blessed to have homegrown people such as our city manager here and many of our staff here. So again, our city,
we're a family here. Keep up the good work
and there's a lot more opportunities.
Thank you.
Mayor Portem 1.
Just ditto everything everyone's already said.
Congratulations, Diana.
I appreciate you stepping into this role in this permanent position now and look forward to many years working together.
Thank you. I'm very honored to continue to contribute to the city
and looking forward to all the good work that we're going to get done.
Thank you so much.
I want to share one of my neighbors actually remembers Diana when she was a librarian
and I shared with her that she was now her assistant city manager.
She said, little Miss Diana, she's the assistant city manager.
Did little D say that?
The little D said that. She's smaller than I am.
I know.
But she said, and I quote, she's so boss.
So we appreciate all that you do.
Thank you so much. Thank you.
And fun fact.
And fun fact, I'm hoping that she will play the ukulele one day for us here at a city council meeting.
You play the ukulele?
I'm a little rusty. It's been a little while. Perhaps.
And we have one more announcement.
This is more on a little bit of a somber note. Fire Chief Matt Hollick, if you can come up, please. so Fire Chief Matt Hallock actually will be leaving the city of Monterey Park he accepted a position with another city even though we're sad to see him go we are definitely very appreciative of his 22 years of service
to the Monterey Park community
we're definitely proud of the last three years
serving as Fire Chief
we're proud of his accomplishment and leadership and the community is also invited to visit him at the fire station next Thursday January 25th at 4pm if they'd like to bid their farewells to Matt we wish him well and all his future endeavors and thank you Matt for your excellent leadership. City Council
Thank you so much Matt for everything that you've done
I can't imagine how it must feel
to leave an agency
after 22 years, this is my 22nd year teaching and I know how that must
feel so
we appreciate everything that
you've done
unnoticed. We really appreciate everything that you've done, and I don't think we would be here today and where
we're at at this moment if it weren't for you and
all of the firemen that are here today. So we appreciate everything that you
do, and we wish you luck in all your future endeavors.
Just know that
you'll always have a home here in Monterey Park.
Thank you.
Council Member Lo. Thank you.
Well, Chief Halleck, Matt,
Yeah, this is bittersweet.
I mean, congratulations, of course, but also bittersweet because, you know, for myself, you know, thinking about from being in my term, which is in 2020 to now, and everything in this community has gone through and experienced, and yet I think as a city, as a community, you know, we stood together strong. And a lot of it is attributed to the leadership at the top, which sets the tone. and in this case with the fire department, you know, you have just been exemplary and stellar in your leadership. And so, you know, again, especially this past year, our firefighters, our first responders just made us proud of the community. And so it is very sweet. But again, we wish you best of luck. And, you know, and yes, as our mayor so said, you know, I mean, always know that Amara Park will always be your home. and feel free to always come by and visit us.
Thank you. Council Member Yu?
Yes, hi, Matt.
Wow, I just bring back a lot of my memories. It seems like we were at the same battlefield during COVID. And also Matt Shitting, your first responder. So we have been together a lot.
And I really appreciate you're such a great leader. And I wanted to wish you all the best on the next phase.
and I'm sure that, yeah, I feel so bad.
How come all the, you know, good leaders are leaving us so soon? And so I hope, you know, yeah, you have the best future. Thank you.
Council Member Ngo?
Oh, Matt, nice knowing you. You know, we talked about this. Both our kids go to slow, and we talked about the opportunities for them, giving them the freedom and letting them grow, and I think this is part of your growth in your career We're really delighted you spent most of the time learning, growing, harnessing your leadership skills here, and then now spreading it to other cities. And I think what you did is noble in the sense that everyone from the city appreciated your help through the MassCash incident as well as many years of service here. So go spread your wings because that's how our city works.
like I said earlier, we're family,
and when our family members succeed, we all succeed.
So we are sad to see you go,
but we're happy that we've expanded our family out,
and we're growing. So congratulations. Thank you.
Mayor Pro Temp.
Echoing what everyone's already said,
thank you so much, Matt.
I appreciate your many years of service here in the city of Monterey Park. You are leaving the department and the city in a better place than, I think, when you came in. and we're blessed to have had this many years with you and with your leadership and know that wherever you're going next, they'll be pleased and proud to have you leading them as well. But as was already said, you'll always have a home in Monterey Park. You're welcome to come visit any time and shop here in Monterey Park and spend some money in the city, of course, to continue to support the fire department and our city services. but appreciate all that you've done for us here in the city your leadership especially in the last year and Best wishes on your next endeavor
Thank you We'd like to give you time to share some words. Yeah, I appreciate it. I wasn't planning to speak
I think we weren't even gonna announce this until just a handful of hours ago. So
you know your support over my tenure as fire chief is I
I don't think I would have been able to do what I've done or we have done without your support. So these four years, starting with COVID, you know, who knew that was going to grow into what it did. And so we navigated that together with council, with department heads, and, of course, with all the staff. And so I'm thankful for your support. And, of course, this last year navigating this shooting and what it did to our community brought us all together. And for that, I'm grateful for the guidance and the leadership and support that you've provided to the fire department. And, of course, the department heads that we've worked together with over the course of the last four years as fire chief.
I'll definitely miss those relationships.
I've built quite a few along the way. But I'll definitely miss everybody here.
And I know this is my home. You know, I've got my favorite restaurants. So I'll be back for sure. But I definitely want to thank you know the the group in the back
and we know without them and and their support and
it would not have been as rewarding as it has been for me to lead this department if it wasn't for them and you know coming up through the ranks and knowing Knowing them it that was a very difficult decision to to leave But it's one that's I think right at this time and you know my mom says all things for a reason and I believe that so So thank you for your support and this opportunity to speak and address everybody,
and thank you for my time here in Monterey Park. It's been quite a ride. And to you, I'll say, I watched your daughter because my young kids were here for promotional opportunities, and my daughter was that age probably pinning a badge on my chest, and I blinked,
and now she lives in Washington, D.C. My son's graduated from slow, and my youngest is in college. So enjoy it while they're that little because it went by super fast, and so did this ride. So thank you. Thank you.
And I'd like to invite the council to present a plaque to Chief Halleck.
So we have a plaque here for Matt Hallett and I'm not an elementary school teacher so I haven't mastered the art of reading this way.
It says in recognition and gratitude for your 22 years of service, exceptional leadership, and unconditional commitment to serving the Monterey Park community.
so we present this class to you and we again hope that you know that you have
a home here in Monarch Park so please join us in thanking Chief Halle
Okay.
We'll go ahead and jump to the next item.
Thank you, City Manager, for all of those updates. Fire Department.
While Chris Thompson makes his way down here this is Battalion Chief Chris Thompson just wanted to make another announcement that Chris will be serving as our interim fire chief
upon Matt's departure
so welcome Chris as our interim fire chief as Matt departs us and Chris has been with the department for over 20 years
so thank you Chris
Thank you, Mayor, Councilman. 30 years ago today, we had a great earthquake called the Northridge Earthquake of 1994. And the city of Monterey Park has always had the privilege and the honor to try to keep our community safe and try to build the resiliency.
February 24th, we're going to have another one of our community preparedness clinics.
And it's going to be an L.E. Park February 24th at 9 a.m. until 12. And we want to make sure that we have all our communities come out and try to make sure that they be a part of our preparedness for our community.
You'll learn different types of exit drills for your home, how to shut off utilities,
how to make sure that your home and your neighbors are all ready to go for a disaster.
We're going to make sure that we get all this information on social media before the day happens,
but we just wanted to make sure that we announced it for our community to be prepared.
Well, thank you so much, and I'm assuming this is going to be advertised on social media. Excellent.
Well, first of all, congratulations on your new appointment.
Thank you so much for taking this on.
I know it's not necessarily an easy task, but I know that your commitment to our fire department and to our city has not been unnoticed. And so that is why I'm assuming we appointed you. But thank you so much for everything that you're doing. I'd also like to offer Council a chance to say a few words.
Thank you, Mr. Mayor. Well, congratulations, Chief Thompson. We are looking forward to working with you. and just thank you for your commitment and your investment and tenure here in our community. So congratulations.
Council Member Yu?
Thank you, Chief Thompson, and look forward to partnering with you, and hopefully you will be our next model for the fashion show replacing Matt Hollett. But thank you. Looking forward to working.
Council Member Go? Chris, congrats. You've earned it.
I know you got big shoes, but you'll get there.
We believe in you. So it's time. It's time to step up. You'll do it. Thank you. Thank you.
All right.
Mayor Pro Temp.
Appreciate you, Chief Thompson, stepping into these shoes and this role,
and look forward to your leadership in the months and hopefully years to come, and appreciate all that you've done over the last few years, and especially my first year on the council, helping us get acquainted with the operations of the fire department and our emergency response kind of planning process and all that. So thank you so much for your many years of service to the city and look forward to many more. Thank you.
Thank you. And then just one last thing. As you're learning your new role and if there's anything that we can do to help you in that process
please reach out to us. Thank you. Thank you.
Thank you.
Our next staff communication is library.
All right. Good evening, Mayor and members of the council.
Kristen Oliver is a city librarian. I'd like to start by noting that her title may now be assistant city manager, but she's always going to be Miss Diana to us. This evening I'm here with a couple of exciting staff updates.
Next slide, please.
To begin, I'd like to introduce the two newest members of the library's management team, Leonie Jordan and Lauren Frazier. Leonie started with the library in November as the senior librarian overseeing adult reference and teen services. services. She hails from Australia and previously worked at the Auburn Library in Australia as the
children's and youth librarian. Some of you may know Lauren Frazier. Lauren actually worked part
time for the library from 2016 to 2018, then accepted a full-time position at Santa Clarita Public Library. They ultimately missed working for us so much though that they returned to Monterey Park in 2020 as a children's librarian, and we're promoted to children's senior librarian
this past December.
I am very excited to have Leonie and Lauren join our management team, which is also comprised
of Victor and Kathleen, who are here with us tonight. And I know that they will be excellent contributors to the success of the library.
Next slide, please.
Additionally, I'd like to recognize adult literacy coordinator Victor Castellanos, library technician Michael Lee, and library assistant Madison Traylor, who recently completed their master's degrees in library and information science. Victor and Michael completed San Jose State University's program, and Madison completed Syracuse University's program. They're all very bright and talented individuals,
and I look forward to watching them develop as library professionals.
With that, I'm going to toss it over to Lauren, who's going to share some updates about library services.
Good evening, Mayor and Mayor Pro Tem, City Council members. I'm Lauren Frazier, the new senior children's librarian. So I am here to provide some updates for the library as well as let you know some of the great programs we have coming up this month.
So a quick recap of some of our recent successful programs.
We had our first teen winter reading challenge, which was a success with 42 teens participating in the challenge who logged a total of 447 hours spent reading over the winter break.
Here you can see the lucky raffle winners with their prizes.
And also on the right here, we have our adult craft programs, craft...
200 people attended our Bluey party in the children's department. We played games, made crafts, did an obstacle course, and more.
So please join us next month for our Pokemon party on Friday, February 16th at 3.30 p.m. All right. We are very excited to begin accepting entries to our library card design contest.
So we are trying to design some new library cards based on the community's designs. So children ages 6 to 12 are invited to design a card that is just for kids, and then teens and adults are invited to design a card for adults.
So when creating your design, you may consider what you love about Monterey Park, what libraries mean to you, a beloved book, or how the library enhances community connections.
So winning designs will be selected based on creativity, artistic expression, and the message communicated. So we will be accepting both digital and paper entries until the end of the month.
So paper entry forms can be picked up at the library. And please visit our website for the complete guidelines and to access the digital design form.
Winners will be announced on April 7th to celebrate National Library Week. Next slide.
All right. So tax season is fast approaching, and so the VITA clinic is back. So individuals or families who qualify are invited to participate in Chinatown Service Center's free volunteer income tax assistance clinic.
So this program helps U.S. residents or legal green card holders prepare their 2023 federal and state income tax returns. sessions will be held from January 18th until April 11th on Mondays and Thursdays and to check eligibility requirements and to register please visit Chinatown Service Center's website or the
library website all right so we are starting a new teen program it's called speaking of English
and this is an English conversation club for teens who are English language learners or want to strengthen their spoken English skills by speaking to other teens in a comfortable environment. So the first meeting is this Friday at 4 30 p.m. Next slide please. All right we also have a small
business workshop coming up in the library. So Chinatown Service Center in partnership with Cathay Bank will offer a three-week entrepreneur training program. It is on Saturdays January 20th and 27th, and February 3rd. These workshops are designed to equip you with the essential knowledge
for running a thriving small business, and these workshops will be presented in Mandarin. So to
register, please call the number up on the slide, and there were still a couple spots left when I last checked. Next slide. All right, and of course we have our free legal assistant clinics. The next
one is on Tuesday, February 13th. So volunteer attorneys will be on hand to answer questions. It is sponsored by the Asian Pacific American Bar Association and Asian Americans Advancing Justice SoCal. So attorneys are available to answer questions about immigration, criminal law, civil matters, estate planning, government benefits, and more. So to register or for any questions about the program, just contact the library. Thank you. That concludes the library
presentation. Are there any questions from Council? Well, thank you so much for the presentation,
and once again, congratulations not just to the newly graduated members of the library, but also the newly promoted members of the library. Thank you so much for all the service
and all the amazing stuff that you do for our kids, for our teen readers, but also our community.
much appreciated. I always say that Monterey Park has the best library in the San Gabriel Valley, so thank you so much.
And all of that is attributed to you
and all that you do. Thank you so much. I'd also, just one quick question.
When was the Pokemon workshop?
The Pokemon party is on Friday, February 16th at 3.30pm.
I'm asking for three little girls that I know. Thank you so much. You don't want to miss it. It's going to be really good. I know I missed the Bluey party, so thank you.
I also want to give Council a chance to say a few words.
Council Member Lo? Mr. Mayor, I concur.
When people ask, why does Monterey Park have such an incredible library with its vast array of services, and I say it's because of the people who work there. I mean, they are the beating heart of the library, and you see before you these dedicated people. And so just thank you very much for all that you do for our community library, and congratulations to all of you.
I wanted to say if you were to thank the library
my mom actually got her passport renewed
from the library service so I'm proud of all the services that you provided
thank you
councilmember Ngo
I love our library
because it's been our resource for the community and congratulations to our senior staff
every one of you
looking to more things to do and more opportunities for our community So thank you and great job with the library.
And just echo what everyone has already said as well. Congratulations to the new graduates and everyone that is serving in different positions. I appreciate everyone stepping up to continue to serve the community. And it sounds like the library is off to a very busy, very active start to the year. Looking forward to much more to come with the library.
I appreciate everything.
And especially the partnerships with outside organizations to bring these services and resources to our community. and so much happens, so much goes on at the library. It really operates as a community center and a resource center for so many in our communities. Appreciate everything that the staff does to help bring those resources to our community.
Thanks.
Yes, thank you.
And to add to what the mayor pro tem said, I noticed that we have a lot of agencies outside and community agencies that are really helping out
our community through the library.
The Chinatown Service Center and Advancing Justice SoCal and the API Bar Association. Are there any members in the audience of any of these organizations here? Peter, okay, so I want to recognize the Chinatown Service Center. Thank you so much for partnering with us as well.
Thank you.
Thank you.
Thank you. Okay, so we're going to go ahead and jump to the presentation portion of our agenda.
Parks and Recreation.
Oh, that's right. I'm sorry. I'm skipping one. Parks and Rec. How could I miss that?
Good evening, Honorable Mayor Sanchez, Mayor Pro Tem Wong, and Council members. I'm Christina Alotori, Recreation Manager for the Recreation and Community Services Department.
Next slide.
So first, we'd like to thank everyone, all residents, all community members who attended our holiday events this season. The very first thing is Letters of Santa. So we, our department, received over 800 letters to Santa, and we helped, along with the library, get those letters to Santa and make sure that he responded to every person who wrote to him. In addition to that, we had our holiday snow village, and we gave out over 1,500 wristbands for snowplay. That included sledding, that included the snowplay area, and we had over 20 vendors in our vendor area for that event. Then on December 16th, we had our Santa's Jolly Journey, and that was in partnership with our police departments and fire departments. And we had over 1,200 people visit the Santa Tracker app. So that's how we were able to kind of put our finger on the pulse as to how many people were connected with this event. And then our holiday luncheon at the Langley Senior Center saw over 200 registrations. With that event, there was entertainment, dancing, and lunch was provided. In addition to that, Hilda Solis' office also helped sponsor that event just to be able to provide additional activities for that event.
and it helps subsidize a cost for meals. Next slide, please.
So our upcoming event is on January 21st,
and it is the Candlelight Vigil,
and that is to honor the victims of the mass shooting. We'd like to invite everyone to come out. This event is going to be held rain or shine. It will be at City Hall in the front lawn, and it will be from 6 to 8 p.m. There's additional information on the website if that is needed.
Next slide, please.
To honor our Lunar New Year, on Saturday, January 27th, and Sunday, January 28th,
in the downtown area of Monterey Park, we are having an event. There will be vendors, food vendors, live entertainment. So we are inviting all the community to come on out to the downtown area and celebrate the Lunar New Year.
Next slide, please.
Our Langley Senior Center is offering two seminars.
First is on January 18th, and that is a hepatitis B seminar that's from 9 to 10 a.m. at the Langley Center. In addition to that, in February, on February 15th, the Langley Center is offering a prevention scam seminar to assist those seniors to help protect them and give them more information about these workshops. And that will be held from 10 to 11 a.m. again at the Langley Center.
Next slide, please.
In partnership with the L.A. County Department of Mental Health, we are hosting at the Langley Center a youth mental health summit, and that will take place on Saturday, February 24th from 9.30 to 3 p.m.
This is absolutely free.
It's strongly encouraged that those young adults who would like to participate,
that they should register.
And this information, again, is available on our website, and it's available by scanning the QR code.
Next slide, please.
So we have had a ton of playground projects going on within our department.
We recently opened Sequoia Park, and that was a really great event.
We had a ton of community participation, but there's more. So if you have not had a chance to get out there and celebrate with us the new playgrounds, this Saturday at Bella Vista Park at 10 a.m., so January 20th, We are going to be celebrating the opening of our new playground structure there. And the theme is dragon themed, which goes along with the Bella Vista School mascot. So come on out. We're actually going to be giving out dragon cookies for those in attendance while supplies last. And in addition to that, over at Garvey Ranch Park, we've opened the smaller playground, which is baseball-themed because it looks over the baseball field. And if you just so happen to visit, one of the jerseys says Garvey on the back of it,
and that's for Richard Garvey.
And the jersey number on the back corresponds with the year, which is 1916, that the city was founded. So we're really trying to give our residents some destination playgrounds
to be able to travel throughout the city.
and give everyone a reason to get out and about in our parks.
Next slide, please.
So that is all I have for you.
I would be happy to answer any questions or if you have any comments for me.
Wow, thank you so much for all of that information
and for all of the work that Parks and Rec does for our city.
Extremely excited about the grand opening of another new park equipment at Bella Vista.
which is in my district. So we're excited.
I know my daughters are super excited. We'll definitely be there, not just for the slides,
but also for the dragon cookies.
And also, thank you so much for the amazing programming
at the Snow Village.
I still get tons of comments from community members and residents about the amazing job that Parks and Rec did with Snow Village and just the winter programming. So thank you so much to all the staff for everything that you do because I know it takes a lot of work
and a lot of effort.
So thank you again. And I want to give council an opportunity
to also share. Council Member Lo. Thank you, Mr. Mayor.
And thank you for everyone in your department for a great, robust holiday season.
I think that, you know,
community really is appreciative to be able to celebrate the holidays that we did.
And again, especially, you know,
I think this past year, you know, again, we talked about upcoming vigil
and it has been one year and I think that often times people have asked
what was part of the healing
and I think it's because we
believed in our community and therefore we made sure that we continue to provide the quality programming
throughout this past year. So just thank you
for everyone in your department
and I for one am also looking forward to the opening of the second playground at Garvey Ranch because I live right around the corner when I park and every day when I walk my dog I see the
shuttle taking shape and the
Councilmember Yu? Just to remind everyone about the January 21st
candlelight visual. That would be a very big event and we'll just discuss about
the rundown. So hopefully to see all of you there. Thank you.
Councilmember Go? Christina and Parks and Rex
group. Robert back there as our memo. Congrats. You guys did a fabulous job with the snow village. There's no snow here but we had snow. So think about it. The kids enjoyed it. so thank you so much for that and just one quick shout out i thank the library staff but above and beyond the staff we also have our library trustee and i think we have one here lisa duong who also serves from trustee i want to give a shout out and say thank you for helping the strategic vision and ensuring that our city staff and our city's library services supports
the whole community so thank you and council member go i just want to mention again i know I mentioned it earlier in the presentation, but the library was very, very instrumental in ensuring that we got all of our letters out to Santa so that he got them back.
Because 800 letters is quite a bit to deliver to Santa.
And Mayor Brutem?
I appreciate everything the staff have done, programming through the holidays. There was no shortage of events and activities for the community to take part in. and appreciate being able to bring the community together and that the community did come together and come out to so many of these events to enjoy time together and in community. And our appreciation to all the staff. And I know that just like the library and other departments here at the city, we're off to a very busy, very active start to 2024.
I know that there's a lot more to come.
And with Lunar New Year just around the corner and this weekend with the vigil, WE'RE NOT STARTING SLOW HERE IN MONTERARY PARK. APPRECIATE EVERYTHING AND ALL THE WORK THAT GOES INTO PUTTING THESE ON AND MAKING SURE THEY GO OFF SAFELY. APPRECIATE ALL THE WORK THAT YOU'RE DOING TO LEAD THE
RECREATION FOLKS.
I DON'T KNOW HOW WE GOT ALL THOSE LETTERS TO SANTA AND THEN THE RESPONSE IS BACK. FOR THE MAYOR ASKING IF WE CAN SHARE WHATEVER LINE OR DIRECT LINE WE HAVE TO SANTA, WE MAY NEED SOME HELP FOR some activities coming up this year too and I will just say for the the parade route or whatever for Santa's journey through Monterey Park Santa bore a slight resemblance to our mayor but he went by a little bit too fast but someone was saying hi to everyone sounded like our mayor as well so appreciate us bringing despite how busy Santa was during the holiday season answering all those requests and the letters they took some time to go around our city and saying hi to people who
want to come out to the sidewalk.
But look forward to many of those events coming up again
this year.
And thank you so much for all the work that goes into it.
Thank you.
Yes, thank you.
And for the record, I did ride with Santa.
That was a very magical, not just for me, but for my daughter who came along with me. So thank you so much.
And I know that we just had fourth graders here a couple days ago, and many of them raised their hand. They saw Santa going through their city. So thank you so much for that.
Thank you.
So we'll go ahead and now jump to the presentation portion of our agenda. And our first presentation is the Metropolitan Water District. And actually, before we get started, I did want to mention, you might have seen a comfort dog back there, Ruben, who has joined our council meeting. He will be here all week to help the community as we approach our one-year anniversary. But if you at some point feel like you need a break or are starting to get too anxious
and this agenda seems to keep going and going, feel free to go back there and talk to Ruben.
Mr. Mayor, members of the Council, the next presentation is going to be given by Sam Mouad. he's with our Garvey he's doing the Garvey Reservoir presentation he's with
MWD.
Good evening Mr. Mayor, Mayor Pro Tem, council members and members of the community. Today I will be presenting information on the Garvey Reservoir Improvements Program. Next slide. In our program overview, I will present background information about Metropolitan Water District of Southern California, Garvey Reservoir, program description, and project scope. Finally, I provide general information on the California Environmental Quality Act, or CEQA, and the Environmental Impact Report. Next slide. Metropolitan Water District of Southern California, the owner and operator of Garvey Reservoir, located here in Monterey Park, was established in 1928 as a water wholesaler comprised of 26 member agencies. Metropolitan delivers water to its member agencies, who serves approximately 19 million people in six
Southern California counties. Next slide. The main objectives of Garvey Reservoir Improvements
program are the following. Improve major Garvey Reservoir facilities, maintain Garvey Reservoir reliability, improve operation efficiency and maintenance, and enhance site security. Next slide. As you know, this is where Garvey Reservoir is located in your city. While Monterey Park is not a metropolitan member agency, we really appreciate the long history of collaboration with your city as we recently worked closely on several drainage and erosion improvements around the Garvey Reservoir property, which will
be shown in more details in the next slide. Next slide. Garvey Reservoir is a
treated water reservoir constructed in 1954 in the city of Monterey Park. The
reservoir has a capacity of 1,610 acre feet or 525 million gallons. Metropolitan's Middle Feeder North and Garvey Ascot Feeder bring water into the reservoir and water exits via the Middle Feeder South. The blue color shows the different reservoir components that will be rehabilitated under this project. Next slide.
The project includes improvements to several key components of the facility.
The floating cover and liner will be replaced. The outlet tower will be upgraded.
Then the electrical and water quality laboratory buildings will be renovated as well as replacing the facility standby power generator and perimeter fence.
Finally, the junction structure valves will be replaced.
Improving these existing facilities will ensure reservoir reliability, facilitate efficient operations and maintenance, and enhance site security. Next slide.
The California Environmental Quality Act, or CEQA, is primarily intended to achieve the following purposes as it relates to this project. identify potential impact to the environment, inform the public and decision makers about those potential environmental impacts, identify ways to avoid or reduce the potential environmental impacts, and also to develop the environmental documentation.
Next slide.
This graphic shows an overview of the CEQA process for an environmental impact report. The red star shows where we are as of tonight.
Metropolitan began circulating a notice of preparation today with the initial study.
We'll also prepare the draft EIR and we'll release it by the spring of 2024.
The draft EIR, with the notice of availability, will initiate the 45-day public review and comment period. We plan to return for a more detailed presentation after we complete the environmental studies. Next slide. This map shows the City of Monterey Park residents that will be receiving the Notice of Preparation, or the NOP. The area shown in orange represents residents that will be notified by mail and walk-in and what is required by CEQA for public noticing. And the area shown in green represents the additional residents that will be notified by walk-in and Metropolitan is voluntarily including in the public review process. Next slide. This concludes my presentation. I will be happy to answer any questions.
Excellent.
Thank you so much for the presentation and that information.
Any questions from Council? Council Member Lo?
And again, as we go through this process, so you said that notes will be sent out for the media area.
Are we talking about notes being mailed or residents being phone banked?
The orange one that you see, the one that butts against the property of the reservoir, will be mail and walk-in.
Okay.
And the green, which we're doing as additional, will be walk-in.
And Mitchell, it will be in multiple languages?
I don't think so.
It will only be in English?
Only in English, yes.
Well, shouldn't you have it in other languages,
given the linguistic diversity of our community?
I would suggest you do that,
and not just throw your hands while you're talking to me.
Okay. Okay, meaning we have to hire somebody who-
Mr. Mayor, members and the council, if I may,
we will work back with staff from Metropolitan Water District
to see what we can do to have translation available. We'll work back with staff from Metropolitan.
Okay.
Council member, you? Council member, Glew?
Mayor Portempoin?
Thank you, appreciate the opportunity. First, I would love to request a tour of the facility. I've actually, I grew up here, I know of the reservoir, but I've never actually been into the space to see it internally. I don't know if other counselors might be interested in staff as well. Maybe we can set something up and follow up.
We can arrange that. We will talk with the city manager and we can arrange that at any time.
We'd love to see.
And then in terms of the improvements, it sounds like most of it is just updating existing structures. You're not looking at capacity increase?
No, no capacity increase. It's just the cover, the lifespan is 25 years or 20 to 25 years.
It's time to renovate it, to replace it. And because we're replacing it, we're renovating everything else.
Okay.
And I know the city does have an emergency interconnection to the guarded reservoir. we're not touched that's not being adjusted there's no issues that's not that's okay and then uh but if they're with these improvements are is met looking at emptying the reservoir to do these
i mean if there are other but there is a uh the pipelines we have bypasses and and uh i'm i'm guessing when the city connection will be on the pipeline not on the reservoir itself so you will
not have cut off for that connection.
OK. Well, hopefully we don't need it. I'm just saying.
But usually we make sure that water is delivered all the time. And if we have a shutdown, we'll let you know. OK. And then if we have a period of no water, we'll let you know.
I'm just curious from an operational perspective for MET,
if you're emptying, how long are you for the improvements
and stuff?
I know the reservoir is used for balancing on the water system for delivery.
Well, yes, it delivers all the way to Palas Verdes,
meaning we have feeders that service connections that goes all the way down.
And it uses that to feed water, that power.
Yeah, and so if you're shutting down Garveyed Reservoir for a number of days or weeks or months, or you're not...
We're shutting down the reservoir, but we have bypass.
So the water will stay going to the member agencies.
Right.
So no operational impacts to those that do depend on Garvey Reservoir?
No.
But, of course, the construction is a kind of lengthy construction that will take probably between 12 to 18 months. Okay.
So once you have the EIR finalized, you're expecting a year or two of construction before everything.
Okay.
and then I know we have I mean if you're going to be emptying the reservoir and doing work if there is work on the city side that we need to look at with our emergency connection or other things in terms of rehabbing the hillside or anything else maybe we can collaborate and align some of those schedules if if there's any work we need to do on our end if this construction works going to
be happening anyway and then I know we've our city staff and met staff have
had at least some initial conversations about potential additional recreational uses for the existing met property around Garvey Reservoir. Already we have, I think some of our playing fields are in some of the potential flood areas for the reservoir. If there are potential opportunities to expand, if you're looking at adjusting the fence line or adjusting the fence fencing at all if there are opportunities to adjust the fence line to increase the available space for surrounding neighborhood and residents to make use of some recreational opportunities at the reservoir to increase public access to some of the space
take on to those activities, that would be, I would highly encourage that.
And I think this is an opportunity to explore that a little bit more substantively. Even a walking path or some other kind of opportunity there to expand uses for the neighborhood would be, if we can at least explore that, that would be great.
Yeah, we will look into that. We will work with the city.
Meaning while we're doing the final design and we're working on it,
we will make sure that the city is in our sites
and we let them know what we're doing and we will work with them on these things. Great.
And then I would just echo what Councilor Lo mentioned as well. If we can make sure that the notices for impacts and the IR are in language, especially for those in that surrounding neighborhood,
that would be great. I know staff will follow up on that,
but I think that would be important to do. and if we can assist in making that happen, I think let's do that.
Thank you so much. All right, thank you.
Thank you. And City Manager, if we can follow through with them.
And I am also interested in doing the tour of that facility.
But to Council Member Lo's point,
also ensure that the people who are being impacted are contacted in multiple languages to make sure that they are aware of what is happening in this area.
We will definitely work back. Thank you.
Thank you.
Our next presentation is from the MPK Hope Resiliency Center.
Mr. Mayor, members of the council, we have members from Chinatown Service Center. We have Peter Ng and Nina Locke.
Good evening, Mayor Sanchez, Brayne Poutine-Wang, and our council members. I am Peter Ng from Chinatown Service Center, and with me together is Nina Lok.
She is the director of our behavioral health department, as well as in charge of the Resiliency Center. We're very happy to be here to give you our first report of the latest development of the Resiliency Center, but I do want to take this opportunity to thank the city council, all the city staff during this difficult time since the mass shooting to help the community of the whole city. I mean, I'm a resident of 40 years in the city of Murray Park. I've never had anything on such big scale that happened to us and everyone is just so devastated, but yet everyone pulled together and overcome this great tragedy. And there are so many affected victims, and even the supporters, our first responders, they were impacted as well. So the work, it was just so tremendous that at time we didn't know where to begin. But with the support from the city, we were able to pull together little by little. And this resiliency center actually started in April. so we a group of non-profit and also community members they get together and figure out what we're going to do and with the city's help we were able to develop and from April till August we were able to transition from even the library we started out thanks to our library Diana Garcia helping out we were setting shop over there Then we move on to other facilities, and then the city gave us the opportunity to set up the center over at Sierra Vista Park until today. So I'm going to let Nina give all the detail to share with all of you over here, and hopefully that our city, all the citizens watching, to understand how great that we are in a city of love. And we're just one big family, like Council Member Ben said. We're all in one big family. Thank you.
Wow. Good evening, everyone. I'm going to skip and move straight forward to our presentation. I couldn't have said it any better than Peter, so I want to give you all some information in regards to the MPK Hope Residency Center. So the operation is being led by Chinatown Service Center, but it's a collaborative effort with many other partner organizations to ensure that we do have a comprehensive service to meet the needs in the community. So here are some partner organizations such as AJ SoCal, Tsuji Buddhist Foundation, Special Service for Group, the Silver Division, and the APCTC Division. The Silver Division focuses direct, they're a DMH contracted agency serving the API population for the older adult, specifically serving the older adult and then the APCTC is also a DMH contracted partner serving mainly the family and youth population. All in all we the purpose or services in the residency center is to provide trauma related healing and it includes like individual counseling support group, workshop, linkages, and system navigation. It's different forms of healing depending on what individual's needs are. All of these are tailored towards what we're hearing, learning from the community as they share with us as they come through our door, letting us know their experience. So like Peter mentioned, we started. Since day one, we were asked to respond. 2D mass violence and we were at the Langley Center providing translation and interpretation services because we are known we have been in the community for so many years 20 plus years where we have count counselor case management that does provide language support 2D service so we were asked to be there since day one. And the service never stopped since then. And definitely thank you to the support of the city. After about a week or so, two weeks or so, where we pivoted to continue to service at the library. And the reason being is that we understand Langley is one location, but at the same time, other location might be more accessible and more comfortable of an environment for an individual to come by and ask for service. And it was more like a check-in, a walk-in and step-in, check-in, wellness check-in. We had case manager, counselor there, where as we're talking to them, we're also providing assessment of their well-being. And if needed, we also had a room in the back, so really thank you to the library, where we were able to walk them to the back to talk to them individually. Here are some statistics. Since January, we have served over 672 individuals at the library. We're just talking about the library right here. 92 visits from us to the library. And in terms of hours, 600 hours, our current schedule were there three days a week. Initially, it was every single day for about a month and a half or so. And then we lessened it three times a week and then two times a week. Since we're now closer to the one-year mark, we have increased our visibility at the library again. Moving on to the next slide. So here at the Residency Center, we started physically at this Sierra Vista location in August. From August to now, actually from August to December, 1015, so 1515 touchpoint individual has been at the Residency Center.
an average of about 300 attendees at the Residency Center
and a total of 238 workshop events. And these workshops are inclusive of cultural activities, qigong, mindfulness activities. And these activities are really tailored towards collective healing. We understand individual counseling are very beneficial, but at the same time we work with a population that are geared towards more collectiveness. So it has been very well receptive. Majority of the visitors are seniors, 60 and above, and we have served about 30% of those are receiving individual counseling due to the New Year tragedy.
and most of our pictures, we do take pictures
but we do blur out their face just for confidentiality reason and moving on to the next slide which is our ballroom dance and it has been very well receptive, our first one was end of November I really do want to share how the creation of this ballroom was developed and what we created. It wasn't something that our staff have come up with.
It was actually a collective work with the direct victims,
with the survivor, with the participant of the residency center. They let us know what they want to see in a ballroom dance workshop setting. So from that process, it was really recreating the narrative for them. So it's their healing process is how this ballroom dance has been created. And it has been very beneficial for those that really were able to open up to share with us
what kind of music they want to hear, how they want their environment to be. So the first one, we had 80 participants,
and the first feedback was, you need a bigger space. So working with the City Recreation Center, Robert Langley Center was the spot. so we had our second one early December and it was there were 240 participants and then we had our third one end of December and it was about 200 participants so all in all about 500 participants from three workshops they come out all dressed up make up everything really ready to dance and it's beautiful because it's their way and you can see their healing process from this experience we're going to continue with this ballroom dance on a monthly basis.
And so, next slide, please.
As you could see, ballroom dance continue, but at the same time, partnership, collaborative work,
what many others are also very necessary because we understand there are so many other needs. So throughout the year, these are some of the collaborative. there's many more that have not been listed here.
We continue to work with the community, and we learn from them, learning from the city too, letting us know what you guys are hearing and what we can provide to the community.
And moving forward to the next slide. So these are just some future planning. We really want to bring more resources and collaborative opportunity, creating more social connection with the community and social connection opportunity for anybody coming together. It's a form of not just healing, but then the connection helps with mental wellness, being able to talk to each other and just build connection. And, of course, Ballroom Dance. We're also working on our permanent space, and it's identified. It's on Atlantic Boulevard, 883 North, South Atlantic.
I'm so sorry. It's next to the dialysis. It's in the same building as the dialysis building, the Vida.
Yeah, so, and then donation for supports such as refreshment and light snacks are always needed because those are items that tend to be difficult to come by via, like, city, county, or grants of any sorts. so we really appreciate if there's any donations for refreshment and light snacks just for audience workshop and dance workshop that we have for the community that's that's the last lights any questions or concern we can help answer well first of all thank you so much for being here
tonight and for all of the amazing work that Chinatown Service Center and the Resiliency Center is also doing. You've been an amazing partner this
last year since
the shooting, and we really appreciate everything that you've done. I had the opportunity to visit the Resiliency Center, and I know we were making
lanterns for the upcoming
vigil, and I could tell and sense from the community there that just very excited to be
there, and that they're
almost second home.
And as a
matter of fact one of your employees is a former student of mine so really appreciate all the work that you're doing here in the community for people who haven't had a chance to visit the Resiliency Center or even see the list of all of the amazing workshops that are provided they're there even
So thank you so much.
You've been an amazing partner. We thank you.
It's very, very, very blessed to have you. I'm going to go ahead and give Council a chance to also speak. Council Member Lo? Sure.
Thank you, Mr. Mayor.
Peter, Nina, and to everyone at CSC, you know, this community just also did a gratitude for just your partnership and your support, you know, during what has been a very challenging time for this community. And I think you definitely give meaning to, you know, resiliency.
I do have a question.
And first of all, we're glad to hear that you're looking and it sounds like you've found a permanent location. So let us know how we in our capacity can help support that. But as you continue to offer a way of services and you're working with the community in terms of talking to them, having a space for them to process all that they are feeling and thinking, is there anything that stands out in terms of needs or services?
Something that we need to try and double our efforts?
And it could be more than one issue, but, you know, again,
you know, when we talk about healing from, you know,
something like the tragedy we had experienced on January 21st, you know, healing, you know, is a process that can take a while.
And I'm just very curious, are there anything that you hear that we need to do a better job of? I wouldn't say a better job in any way
because I think all of us were never really prepared for a situation like this, and I think we're all doing the best that we could.
From what I'm learning and also seeing, I understand that many still don't understand what is trauma. They don't understand the effect of trauma,
and not that they feel like they don't recognize within their body
the physical signs, but then they're able to express the physical symptoms
but they're not able to relate oh it was due to some traumatic experience like these trauma cues that it's actually
hitting them so now that it's one year mark I think some of them are actually expressing some of their getting more headache or they're getting stomach they're feeling like uneasiness in chest they're cute but they're not realizing that it's because we're closer, we're getting closer to the one-year
mark. And it's very natural to be having some sort of anxiety-related feeling. Yeah. I see.
Well, I do want to thank the council members and some of our city staff,
the manager of also joined us last Thursday, thanks to the receiving fund, to
subsidize, to sponsor the dinner. And then, as you can see, all the guests they came, many of them were victims. And the city councilman
and everybody went up the stage and engaged and really bring up the joy from them. But I do want to say that at that moment, you see everybody's happy, but some of them, when they go home, they will reflect back. And these are something that we will have to talk to them and counsel them one-on-one on a private sector environment.
But the engagement of the city support is just invaluable.
That really helped to bring them back much quicker than what it should be.
Council Member Yu?
I wanted to greatly appreciate Chinatown Service Center. You're the one that, you know, stand up for us,
and we have the mental booth in the library within out of the box to help people
and also Resilience Center. I wanted to say we can see what you have done to our community.
You have a very good heart. We can all see your heart.
Don't get discouraged by a lot of different comments from everywhere, but we see that, you know, what you have done for us.
You have done a lot, and the community did benefits from your service.
So don't get discouraged. I wanted to salute to you and keep up the good work. Thank you.
Council Member Ngo.
Well, I say this to Peter and Nina almost every time we meet or every time we have a meeting.
I'm just so blessed.
You guys are leaders in your organization. And the center, CSC center overall, has provided so much relief and support to our community. and kudos to you guys for shepherding the team and making the community a lot better
thanks to you too you are our chair of csc
and thank you so much to csc and all the partners that have been working to bring these services and resources to our community but especially csc for really leading the effort in helping to organize and get everyone going in the same direction. And immediately after in the aftermath of the shooting, you were on the ground right away with our staff and county and everyone else to make sure that our community was provided the resources that they need and appreciate the long-term commitment that CSC is making both in your regular day-to-day business of running health services and other services to the community and that you have been for many decades now, but also in the response to the shooting, knowing that you're taking the lead on the Resilacine Center and their commitment with the permit space and knowing, as you've mentioned, that the trauma from the shooting will be many years long in terms of processing and bringing healing. I appreciate you just, one, providing these services and these activities for our community to be able to come together and build and rebuild that sense of community and safety here in Monterey Park, but also just providing a space for the community to be community, right, and to build trust with service providers and help to break the stigma of seeking help around mental health and behavioral health issues that for not just in the Asian American community, but many communities is often hard for many people to get over. I know it's a long-term commitment and changing culture and people's behaviors and approaches to these things IT'S NOT AN EASY TASK, SO I APPRECIATE CSC PARTNERING WITH SO MANY TO BRING THESE RESOURCES AND TO HELP ADDRESS THIS ISSUE HERE IN MONTERARY PARK AND KNOW THAT THIS IS A LONG-TERM COMMENT ON YOUR PART AND THE PARTNERS IN THIS EFFORT AND COUNT ON THE CONTINUE TO COUNT ON THE CITY TO BE A STEADFAST AND ACTIVE PARTNER IN THIS WORK IN THE YEARS TO COME. AND LOOKING FORWARD TO HOPEFULLY THE RIBBON-CUTTING FOR THE PERMANENT CENTER, But know that any of our facilities if there's still need and I think I imagine there will be for other kind of pop-up services Please count the city in for any of that and please look to us as a partner and resource as well
Thank you so much
Thank you
We're gonna go ahead and jump to item 1c
recreation staff recognition
Yes, Mr. Mayor and members of the council, I'd like to do this presentation. So during the holiday season on Friday, December 22nd, at about 10, 20 a.m. at Langley Center, we had an 80-year-old male community member who had collapsed.
Staff noticed the gentleman lying on the floor and quickly realized that the gentleman was nonresponsive.
Tonight we would like to recognize two recreation staff, Chan Lim and Michelle Chan, for immediately stepping in and administering first aid and calling 911 for medical assistance.
They performed CPR and used the AED machine while waiting for paramedics to respond. We are extremely proud of their response.
And later that day, the paramedics returned to Langley Center to share that the community member was doing well
and let staff know that their quick action was definitely very helpful
to ensure that this person was able to be revived. And from my understanding, the community member has already returned
and is participating again at Langley Center.
So tonight, unfortunately, Michelle Chen was not able to join us tonight, but we do have Chen Lim with us tonight from the recreation staff.
we'd like to ask him to come up please for recognition from our City Council. Thank you.
If we haven't mentioned it before this is part of what what makes our Parks and Rec Department so amazing. If I can ask Council to join me up here to recognize.
Thank you.
We appreciate you. You're part of what makes Monterey Park an amazing community. Let's give him one more round of applause.
On behalf of our city, we have a certificate.
Certificate for you. Thank you.
You want to get it? Thank you. Hold again.
Thank you. Thank you.
I realize we didn't give you, Mr. Lim, a chance to speak or say a few words if you wanted to. No? Okay. Thank you.
Thank you.
we're going to go ahead and jump to
to yeah old business
and we have item 2A I did want to mention that we moved
item 2B
to the regular consent
calendar item so we just have items 2A and 2C
So we'll go ahead and start with item 2A, discussion of findings on the city's inclusionary housing ordinance visibility fee study. And I believe we have a presentation, right? And there are some public comments, right?
We'll go ahead and do the public comments first.
First speaker, Jerry Garner.
Good evening, Mr. Mayor, Mayor Pro Temp, and City Council members. My name is Jerry Garner.
I'm with Arc Development Real Estate.
I'm a development consultant, and I'm working with a developer group in the city of Monterey
Park that's looking at doing a large mixed-use apartment or condominium project here.
And I'd like to make a few comments related to the city's inclusionary housing ordinance.
I guess the city adopted, I know this has probably been in effect for a while.
You've been working with this issue, and the city adopted this housing criteria late in the last development cycle. So development runs in cycles.
As we came out of COVID, things started picking up, but then so did inflation, so did the interest rate,
and that sort of dampened down the development cycle.
So I think right now what's going on with your inclusive housing is it's kind of a hindrance.
It hasn't been helpful.
It hasn't alleviated your housing shortage.
And it's missing what we call it's missing the middle zone. the middle zone being young newlyweds new families that need a starter home or a starter condo and they're looking to move into this city and pay in the range of 600 to 850,000 a lot of the information I'm getting is coming out of your report that this consultant group did and I'll
I'll bring that up in a minute. When the state talks about affordable housing, they're talking about charging someone 30% of what the market rate is.
So, you know, if the market rate on it is $800,000, you know, you're basically even you're building housing that this group can't afford.
As you know, your city's affordable housing mandate is 40% of that
That has to be low income, very low income, and extremely low income people or groups. But you've got to increase, you know this, if you put in affordable housing, you've got to increase the other units that are not affordable. So if you're losing money on 15% of your units, you've got to raise the cost on the remaining 85%. What that does is that drives up the remaining costs, and in this instance, it's driving it out of the market, the target market, that we're trying to hit.
So then the state comes back, and the state says, we'll subsidize this.
We'll give you incentives. If you include affordable housing, we'll allow you to build more units.
Monterey Park. The problem is that they're saying that since you lose money on the affordable units, we'll give you more, and the income stream off of the more units will offset the loss on the inclusionary units. But in this case, we're a development group, or I work with a development group. We've used the city's general plan. You have a really good, well-worked out general plan. plan. It's the law. It's an ordinance. It's the law. It's like the building code. We've maxed out the FAR. We've maxed out the building height. And we've, you know, we're using the
setbacks that are in the code. So we've come up with a project that's got about 50,000
square feet of retail, and it's going to be really nice retail, and 412 apartment or condominium units. We haven't decided which way we're going to go yet. But I think that the added cost to, well, because we're maxed out, having extra units, we can't, it doesn't do us any good. We can't build extra units. Plus, building the extra units actually
increased the cost per unit even more. So we'd like to do a really nice project, but right now we're stymied and so we think that what's going on with affordable housing requirements need to be put on a pause for some time this is a complicated issue it's it's hard to work out
everybody's grappling with it and i think there's ways to work it out but i i think just super
implosing this on these projects like our project we just can't do the project with this kind of criteria put on top of it. I think I'm out of time. I don't know if there's any
questions.
No questions.
Thank you. Do you have a question? Yes. This project you were discussing, where
is it?
You know, we haven't
presented it to the city yet. I'm a little reluctant to say where it is.
I don't know if the... We haven't presented it. We've talked to the planning staff about it, but we have not presented it to the city i see i leave that up to the city manager mr mayor members of
the council um the developer um property owner it's a conceptual um plan at this time so there's not a formal project that has been discussed with staff so that's why they're not sharing that
location at this time but believe me we're serious about it i mean we've hired uh an arc a really well-known architect it's a gorgeous project we've done the performa we want to do the project and we want to do it right away but we can't do it with this affordable housing if you look at your if you look at your inclusionary report your development feasibility study on page 22 of the study it shows that your consultant it shows the types of housing projects he's
Okay, Council Member, did he answer your question?
Okay, so we can't discuss this project just yet anymore, but thank you for your comment and the time.
Okay. Thank you.
Are there any other comments? Next speaker, Oliver Chen.
Good evening, Mr. Mayor, Mr. Mayor Pro Tem, Council members, and city staff. My name is Oliver Chen.
I'm from Team Rice, a real estate investment and development company.
As an experienced real estate team, we've earned honor and success in past decades.
However, the increasing costs combined with affordable housing requirements has highly delayed our investment and development cases.
Development costs consist of four main factors.
One, construction materials. Two, loan interest. Three, construction labor.
Four, government fee. Due to the scarcity of materials and the inflation, loss of construction materials has doubled or even tripled compared to 2019.
The fat rate has risen to 5.5% from 0.25%.
The construction labor's compensation has gone up around 80% to 120%.
Since the market is replacing only one new construction labor for every seven construction laborers that retire or leave.
Although the government could bring incentives to minimize the government fee, we still need to deal with a series of increases in other factors.
Hence, most of the large developers have paused their development and small-scale developers have chosen to develop in a cheaper environment. Based on our research, the new development projects in the Inland Empire are way more than Los Angeles County. It indicated that developers can't make profit and the dilemma requires the government's attention to fix.
Southern California has faced a serious housing shortage for years and the situation got worse after the pandemic. To alleviate the shortage,
the state government established density bonus law to encourage the developers to build more affordable units in their projects by providing specific incentives to the developers. In addition, the city government established inclusionary housing regulations to ask the developer to provide a specific percentage of the project as affordable housing. The intention of these inquirements is to encourage the developers to provide more houses that the people could afford.
However, the incentives cannot even compensate for the increased cost after COVID-19. In addition, the house mortgage in pandemic times has the Lost interest rates. The owners will not be willing to sell their houses by comparing the current rates.
As a principle of economy, given a stable demand, when there is less supply, the higher the price.
We have to let the developers have more confidence to build in order to turn around this situation. The city government still has some flexibility under the state density bonus law.
To encourage new developments, some cities are given the highest criteria under the Defensity Bonus Law.
For example, Pasadena will give a 50% FAR increase compared to Monterey Park's 25% increase.
Therefore, not only for developers, but also for the people, the Inclusionary Housing Act needs to be postponed.
By postponing the act, developers could focus on dealing with the market cost factors and proceed with their development projects. After a few years, the house market will be gradually saturated and that will be the best time for publishing the act. As a matter of fact, Monterey Park is a lovely city that carries lots of memories of first generation immigrants. It has the greatest location in Los Angeles County. We wish the city could be better and we will do our best to contribute to the Monterey Park community not only because of business but also because we love the city. Please consider our situation.
Thank you. Thank you. Are there any other speakers? Next speaker, Selena Zong.
Okay, good evening, mayors and all council members.
I just resident here in Mantra Park, so I will share a little of my thoughts.
Actually, I live in Mantra Park for several years, and also I have a lot of friends live in the same area as I stay. And you know, as I think, there's not too much entertainment places as I live in other cities. When I graduated from my university, I stayed in an urban area and maybe in the city of downtown. I found a lot of entertainment places for fun, for food, and for marketing and for shopping, plaza, big plaza,
but compared with Montreux Park, I think we are lack of these entertainment places.
I know that local policy is good for our residents, which will not attract the developer.
So I think the economy is not that good at the moment.
I think our city could have more good policies to attract more developers to come first and to bring more good plazas and entertainment, supporting entertainment places.
Then we implement the local policy in the future. So I think this is the best for for a resident here in the Monterey Park. Thank you
Thank you. Do we have another speaker? No other speakers. Okay. Thank you. So we'll go ahead and move on to the presentation portion now
Yes, good evening mayor Mayor pro-tem members of the planning. I'm sorry of the City Council. I'm Jessica Serrano your community development director and and this item is a discussion of findings on the city's inclusionary housing ordinance feasibility study. On September 6, 2023, the city council adopted an inclusionary housing ordinance, which we'll reference as IHO, and an IHO in lieu fee formula. As part of this action, the council also directed staff to conduct a feasibility study to evaluate whether the IHO is financially feasible. Based on the council's direction, the city participated in a San Gabriel Valley Council of Governments program in which the city was partnered with a firm called Economic and Planning Services, EPS, to conduct an inclusionary housing feasibility study tailored to Monterey Park. Tonight we have two representatives from EPS who will be presenting the findings of the study, including Julie Cooper, who's seated to my right, and also Chinmay Demley, and he's also in the audience to support this presentation. At this point, I'm going to turn it over to Julie, and she'll begin the presentation.
Thank you, Jessica. Good evening, Mayor, Mayor Pro Tem, members of the City Council. My name is Julie Cooper. I'm a principal with Economic and Planning Systems, EPS. If we can go a couple of slides. Two more. One, two. Just trying to be quick. So this is just repeating some information that Jessica just provided, so I won't repeat it. Just a reminder about the city's existing inclusionary housing ordinance. Next slide. So EPS, we're a land use and economics consulting firm working mainly in the state of California, but also across the country. and we have a very deep and long practice area in affordable housing policies including inclusionary housing policies. And we have been engaged by the San Gabriel Valley COG to conduct inclusionary housing feasibility studies for several cities in the San Gabriel Valley over the past 18 months. And that includes this study that we have just completed for Monterey Park. Next slide. So just very quickly, part of our study, the first step is to understand the housing needs in the city of Monterey Park. This is some information that I'm sure you're all very familiar with on your regional housing needs allocation and showing both the amount of additional housing that the city is zoned to add. It's about 25% increase over existing inventory and the spread of affordability levels that the city is expected to meet for different households at different income levels. Next slide. We do see that there is a need for affordable housing in Monterey Park, as there is in all communities across the state and really the country. based on the median household income and average household size in the city of Monterey Park, we would estimate that the typical household here could afford a single-family home of about $400,000 or rent of about $1,700 per month. This is far below what we see units in the city rent or sell for under current market conditions. So certainly a need for housing that's affordable to a range of income levels in your community. Next slide. the city's had about 100 had about 100 units completed in 2022 mostly multi-family units and there's about 700 more units in the pipeline in various stages of concept in terms of being built we do know that the city has targeted the kind of downtown northeast area of the city with its MU zoning as an area that is expected to see a lot of the new housing development into the future. And this certainly...
Prince���������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������� significant capital investment and there's lots of places where investors can invest money or developers can invest money and so a project needs to be competitive from that perspective
in order for a developer to make a go decision to pursue it. So when we talk about financially feasible we're talking about a development that is achieving that sufficient return on investment
that would incentivize a developer to go ahead and look for investors and go ahead with the project. For the purposes of our analysis, we used two industry standard metrics
to define what we would consider to be a sufficient return.
For rental projects, we used a metric called yield on cost.
This is the net operating income of a project, so that's rental revenue minus operating expenses,
and that's divided by the cost of the development.
And in the Southern California market, under current market conditions, a developer would be looking to achieve at least a 5.5% yield on cost to move forward with a rental project.
On the for sale side, we look at a metric called profit margin, which is profit divided by cost. And again, we're looking to achieve, in this case, a 15% profit margin for a for sale project. Next slide. So why do we conduct feasibility analysis for inclusionary housing programs?
Inclusionary housing does represent a cost on development.
It's either a cost in the fact that developers are building units that cost a certain amount to build,
but they're having to be sold or rented at a below market rate, so there is a cost to them in terms of their revenue stream,
or if they pay an in-lieu fee, that's another line item on the cost side of their ledger.
In either case, it is a cost and it does affect overall return.
And anything that's affecting overall return, particularly for a project that might kind of be on the margin from a feasibility standpoint, could potentially push a project into infeasibility
and a developer can't move forward with it.
So because inclusionary housing programs require that market rate development happen in order to get affordable units to also be developed, we want to help cities understand what are the implications for market rate projects with the adoption of an inclusionary housing requirement.
Next slide.
So in order to conduct our feasibility analysis, we developed several financial models or pro forma models of a range of residential prototype products that reflect what the city is sort of expecting to see in terms of future development in different parts of the city. So these prototypes fell into two buckets. One were a set of prototypes that reflect zoning, that sort of generally citywide zoning requirements.
So this included a prototype at 20 units an acre, which is kind of your single-family attached townhome type of unit that's owner-occupied. And then two multifamily types of projects at 30 units an acre, one that's owner-occupied, so a condominium, and one that would be renter-occupied.
So this reflects, I believe, your R2 and R3 zones in the city. Next slide.
We also, as we mentioned earlier, we know a lot of new housing is expected to be developed in the MU zones.
So we developed a number of prototypes that conform to the zoning in the MU zone. So again, looking at owner-occupied condominiums at 30 units an acre, but with a Lor parking ratio.
And then two multifamily rental projects at 70 units an acre, and also with two different parking ratios, reflecting the Lor parking requirements in the MU zone and the higher density allowances.
Next slide.
slide. So as you can see, so using our some research on development costs in the region
and then as you saw the achievable rents and sale prices for new units that were on the previous two slides, we calculated these return metrics for all of the prototypes. So on the
city-wide set of prototypes what this slide is showing is that for the single-family attached townhome the owner-occupied townhome project these products we would estimate on average
are achieving enough of a return that not only are they feasible to build but they likely can bear
the cost of an inclusionary requirement and this is a common thing that we're seeing across our studies and really reflects that this is a product that is being built in a lot of parts
of the Southern California region right now. On the flip side of that, the multifamily projects or prototypes that we modeled are not achieving even at 100% market rates, even the feasibility thresholds that would suggest
that on average they are financially feasible.
So these types of projects are likely to be financially challenged even without the inclusion of affordable units. Next slide.
In the MU zone, you can see that the return metrics improve quite a bit with the addition of more density and a Lor parking requirement. However, we're still seeing that on average, these projects appear to be financially challenged in terms of meeting these feasibility thresholds. So again, even at 100% market rate, there are challenges to building these, and then that's without the inclusion of affordable units as well.
So I'm going to put sort of a pin in those findings and come back to what we would say they mean for the IHO.
And I'm going to jump to our calculations of an in-lufee, which was another part of our scope for the city of Monterey Park. So as Jessica mentioned, you adopted a resolution. in August regarding the calculation of an in-lieu fee that would go along with your inclusionary
housing ordinance. And this is a requirement actually for inclusionary housing ordinances
that you provide an alternative means of compliance besides providing units on site. And so the in-lieu fee would be that alternative means of compliance. The city included a formula
in their resolution where the in-lufi was calculated as the value of the unit at a market
rate minus the value of a unit at an affordable rent or sale price. This is certainly a valid way
to calculate an in-lufi. However, what EPS has found to be an approach that we think more directly
reflects the direct costs to developers for providing affordable units on site is the cost
of the unit minus the unit value at affordable rates. And what this reflects is that usually at
the rents or sale prices that are affordable to different income levels, covering the cost of the
unit. So there's a subsidy that's being provided to even cover the cost of building the unit. And
so this is why, for instance, in 100% affordable projects, there is a whole stack of different financing sources that are utilized to support those developments because the revenue streams do not make up for the cost.
And so what we are suggesting here is that by using this approach, you're showing that either a developer is providing that subsidy on-site by having the affordable units on-site,
or they pay that same subsidy to the city who can then provide it to a developer who's building affordable units elsewhere.
Next slide. slide. So this slide just shows some examples of how this fee is calculated. So these are
the development cost per unit for a few of the prototypes and then minus what the value
would be at affordable rents or sale prices. And so you can see sort of the range of subsidy
that's typically needed or that would be needed to make these to help cover the gap between
between the cost of building the unit and the value of the unit. Next slide.
So this slide's a lot of numbers.
But overall this is showing what the in-lieu fee would be for the range, the six prototypes that we modeled.
So what we're showing here is that it's sort of best practice to charge the in-lieu fee as either per market rate unit or per market rate square foot.
And so that's what this is showing.
And so in terms of the per market rate square foot, you can see that the fee ranges anywhere from about $14 per square foot to $50 per square foot, depending on the prototype.
And this reflects the kind of range of costs and values that go along with each type of unit.
So it's likely that however you would adopt your in lieu fee, there would be probably a range in what the fee was for different prototypes. And just to provide some context, on the next slide, we did some research on what fees are being charged in a variety of other communities, both in the San Gabriel Valley, in Southern California, and even a few cities in Northern California. And so, again, you can see the range is very wide, from $0.33 a square foot in Pomona to almost $80 a square foot in Pasadena.
So what we've calculated for Monterey Park is certainly in this range, but there's a lot of variation. The one note that I'll make here that I'll mention again in a few slides is that the city doesn't have to adopt their fee to match the financial gap. Some cities make a policy decision to adopt a fee that's Lor than the actual gap that's associated with their inclusionary requirements.
And so on this slide you can see the example here is Yoruba Valley in the Inland Empire.
They charge an in-lieu fee of $2.50 a square foot, which is much Lor than what the associated financial gap is with their on-site inclusionary requirements.
Next slide. slide. Next slide. Okay, so just wrapping up here. So this slide is bringing together all
of the analysis so you can see again the financial feasibility threshold for each product type.
The return that we calculated each prototype is achieving at 100% market rate. And then the return that it achieves when we include either the on-site inclusionary requirement or the payment of the fee. And what we hope to convey here is that there is like a noticeable
difference in the return when you include the affordable units. So this is not an insignificant
cost that developers will bear by having to include these units or pay a fee. There is
definitely an impact on return that we can see in the data. Next slide. So two quick caveats or sort
of notes I'd like to make on these findings. One is that this analysis is not meant to be determinative of the type of development that the city is going to see in the next year, in the next five years, in the next 10 years. This analysis is a point in time evaluation of current average
market conditions. So we can only reflect sort of the average project. And every development project is unique. Some projects are able to achieve Lor costs. Some projects are able to achieve higher rents, higher sale prices. And so just because we are suggesting here that on average certain types of projects are not feasible doesn't mean you won't see those projects
come across the desk here. It just means that on average there are financial challenges and
particularly in the current market, which was alluded to by some of the speakers,
in developing housing in Southern California, and that is reflected in this data here.
The other thing just to mention is the prototypes that we developed for the MU area reflect
recent projects that have been presented to the city, but the MU area actually doesn't have a
density limit or a parking requirement. And so what we would expect is that in the coming
sort of months or years that you may start to see projects in this zone where developers are sort of
pushing the envelope on both sides, both on density and parking, to achieve a feasible project.
I think one of your speakers alluded to the fact that they have a project where they're maxing out as much as they can in terms of what the city allows. So we think that that's one way where,
particularly in the MU zone, you're going to see how you're going to see projects happen.
And then finally, in terms of what we would suggest the city consider in terms of next steps as it relates to the IHO, one is to consider a temporary pause on the inclusionary housing requirements
and a monitoring of market trends over the next one to two years,
and then a reconsideration of sort of bringing it back when market conditions change.
We've seen many cities do this.
This was actually a common thing that cities did during the recession in the mid-2000s,
so certainly not without precedent.
A related approach you could take is to phase in the inclusionary requirements over several years
so that the market can sort of slowly adapt to the requirements.
One example of this is the City of Long Beach, which phased in their inclusionary requirements
over a three-year period. So every year the requirement...
Prince���������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������� city made perhaps a small tweak to their requirements, maybe 10% low, 5% moderate, then any project that's meeting your requirements would also automatically be able to get a density bonus through the state, which not only includes more density, but also other types of concessions that can help the cost side of the equation. And then the final suggestion or consideration is what I alluded to before, which is that you could adopt an in-lieu fee that's Lor than the associated subsidy that goes along with your inclusionary requirements on site. And in this case, you would be incentivizing developers, most developers, to pay the fee, but the city would still be getting some benefit, some money that you could use towards other housing initiatives, while lessening the cost overall to developers to comply with the requirements. These strategies are not mutually exclusive and they could be pursued in some combination. And while they're not going to change the market conditions that we're under, again they can have an impact on reducing costs associated with affordable units. And with that I will conclude my remarks and happy to take any questions or look forward to the discussion. Thank you for your time.
Thank you so much for that thorough report. Questions? Comments? Councilmember Lo?
Yes, thank you. Again, thank you for everyone who participated in this conversation from speakers to those who presented. I'm kind of curious because the list of communities
that you use as your reference, and not to mention probably communities in this area who adopted their IHOs before we did,
do you or your counterparts or colleagues
see any movements to suspend or to revisit them, especially in light of current conditions in the marketplace?
I'm not aware of any recently adopted programs that are now being considered for kind of a pause.
I do think some of these programs are pretty new, and so there might be a sense of kind of waiting to see what happens.
But we do know, for instance, there are cities that adopted their inclusionary policies, you know, many years ago that then did make a pause. Two examples in the region are City of Whittier and City of Duarte,
and both of them took that step. Again, that was more recession-driven,
but under kind of similar market pressures, market pressures that aren't terribly dissimilar to what we're dealing with today. I see.
And I realize when you prepare this,
I don't know if this is including your analysis,
but I know this past year the state,
well, this past year and probably multiple years,
Whereas the state has passed a whole series of legislation which in its totality is supposed to address the affordability issue. And I'm just curious. Yes, there are more conditions that are just reality. But at the same time, you know, I'm assuming at some point we'll go down or else the holiday market may correct itself as well.
But do you believe that with the whole slew of legislation that has passed, probably in the past five, maybe even ten years,
combined with, say, a community's IHO, that it represents a mix of policies and a regulatory environment that would encourage more of that mix of housing that was our intent in adopting an IHO?
I think it's hard to say because the legislation that's been passed, a lot of it has kind of, some of it is more, creates more restrictions, some of it creates less restrictions. I would say that we do see that the state density bonus, which continues to become more and more generous every year, is being used by many developers in the region, including some of the local developers that we talked to in Monterey Park. So it is a very powerful tool that many developers are using, and there are affordable units that come along with that. Some other, I think, legislation that's relevant in this case is, for instance, AB 2097, which gets rid of parking minimums in certain zones that are well served by transit. And parking is one of the largest cost items in a pro forma.
And so anything that can be done to reduce that cost typically is helping in terms of housing production.
But a lot of these factors are bigger than what state or local policy can kind of, you know, there are ways that you can make things easier and reduce certain costs. but one of your speakers talked about the cost of materials, the cost of labor. These are big macroeconomic forces that while, you know, you have an opportunity to reduce fees, reduce costs around the time that it takes to go through pre-development, those are smaller factors related to these larger market factors that are going to take some time to cycle through.
So I do think over time, yes, we're going to see that the combination of legislation that helps to reduce kind of regulation or requirements on development with the market cycle will hopefully result in more housing and housing at various income levels. But it's a little hard to say at this point.
And as you say, it all depends on market conditions. And as you say, I mean, there is a finite supply globally.
And I imagine that probably even pre-pandemic, you know,
there was a time where probably we were competing with other countries
for materials and supplies, right?
Yes, but certainly the pandemic exacerbated a lot of supply chain issues. Okay.
But again, as we sift our way through all of this, you know, and I remember when I was a school board member, this is now probably 10, 12 years ago, that when we had passed a bond measure, what we were told by our construction management firm at the time
was that, because yes, even back then,
the materials for school construction was going up. And I remember the CM firm said, because at the time, China was preparing for the 2008 Olympics, and that drove up the cost of materials worldwide. So fast forward to now, again, if I read papers, and if it's true that China may go through a recession this year, Does that also mean, though, that that could then also mean supplies of materials may become more readily available? Again, I know you may not, but I guess there's hypotheticals I'm just saying.
I think any of those factors are, again, in the macroeconomic perspective, any of those factors can have an impact on just overall housing costs. And it is true the cost of materials has been rising at a pretty steady clip even before the pandemic. If you look at the construction cost index, for instance, it has kind of been going up at a pretty steady high pace over the last many years. So I can't say for sure, but I think, again, the market is cyclical. And we, you know, two, three, five years from now, we may see conditions be slightly more favorable to the development of residential and just real estate projects in general.
Okay. Council Member, you?
I personally support temporary pause, the IHL requirement for a year. The reason why is, first of all, we know that we are closer to recession, but hopefully not. Now development is in a tough situation. It's hard to finance.
and secondly we have the housing units additional 5,200 in the next few years so we need to meet that requirement and in order to temporarily pause that for a year we can speed up the developer choosing Monterey Park hopefully we'll have some more application within that year and we will take the jump start compared to other cities I think bottom line is we want more jobs to create for our people So that's my two cents. Thank you.
Thank you, Council Member. Council Member Ngo?
Yeah, Ms. Cooper, thank you for being here.
Great report. Just a couple of questions.
I mean, I think Council Member Lo asked you about the macro stuff. Let's kind of dive into the local stuff here. I guess you do a lot of these reports?
Yes, we've done probably about 10 of these over the last couple of years just in Southern California.
And it's all infill locations?
Not all of them. We did do reports for four other cities in the San Gabriel Valley,
and those are all pretty much infill cities that are looking at infill.
But we have done some studies in the city of Riverside, for instance,
where we're seeing a bit more greenfield development.
And that's just in our L.A. office. We have an office in Oakland,
and they're also doing these studies all over Northern California. So across the range of city types.
So the infields in the San Gabriel Valley, how many of the cities would you say don't have an IHO at this point?
Very few cities have an IHO.
The only cities, actually, can you go towards the end?
Oh, no, sorry, in the appendix, we have a list.
So this is a list of cities in Southern California specifically that have recently adopted IHOs.
So you can see it's not a lot. There are several of them that are in the San Gabriel Valley, Pasadena, Alhambra, South Pasadena. but it's
more common that a city doesn't have an inclusionary housing ordinance than that they do in this region
A couple of questions to the barriers to entry for building I think we have a couple of developers in the room so I think I'm going to give them kudos for talking about the for cost, construction, labor
Loring interest
and also government fees. So if I had to kind of peg those four, which is the prime factor for not allowing you to bill as a developer?
Well, construction and labor are definitely your largest cost factors by far.
The one category that I think was alluded to
but not maybe kind of specifically called out is what we call sort of soft costs or indirect costs. So that's government fees are in there, but also just all the costs around pre-development work,
consultants, you know, architects, all of those things.
So those represent a certain percentage of costs. And then the financing, you know, the loans and the financing terms are cost.
But I would say, based on our pro formas, we typically see that construction and labor are the big cost items, the major cost items.
So not to speak for you, government fees is probably the Lost factor in all of those.
Yes. I would say, on average, government fees probably represent anywhere from 2% to 5%.
That's just on average. Some places, it's more. One-time costs. One-time costs.
usually one-time cost yeah although um in some cases there is other ongoing uh requirements but
yes one-time costs about maybe two to five percent of the total cost of a unit and those fees are
pretty consistent throughout the majority of the cities i mean there it's if it's a dollar here it's a dollar there it's not a dollar here and ten dollars there it's uh it's pretty i mean it's a
pretty wide range i have to say like if you go i mean it depends what geography you're looking at But if you go from Santa Monica to Riverside, like you're looking at a, there can be a very wide range.
Well, let's just say San Gabriel Valley because we're sitting in the San Gabriel Valley. Oh, yeah.
In the San Gabriel Valley, I would say, you know, some cities we do see slightly higher fees. But in general, yeah, I would say you're all in the same kind of ballpark.
So if I was trying to build something, I would say I can build in Monterey Park, Alhambra, St. Gabriel, Roast Meat. My fee is about the same. Certain cities have inclusionary housing, certain don't.
But it's probably safe to say that a lot of cities are developing that program because of the need for affordable housing or the need to build more units.
So there's an imbalance here.
I mean, it's a state issue. Actually, it's a national issue, affordability for housing. You go back to the Great Recession we had. We built too many homes.
What happens?
Then you didn't build for a while, and now you're building again. But it's probably safe to save in the last 12, 15 years.
Prince����������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������
have a background in real estate lending so they asked for my input and I assured and I think from my view inclusionary housing is something that has been thought out with our city, with our commissions for a few years. It's finally put into effect and then going back to the decisions we made in this group here back in September we ultimately decided that this was probably a good starting point. Now that we agree that everything was going to be set in stone, no. But we agree that it was something that was a starting point where we would provide some additional help for folks who can buy the units where they can afford and help the growing families in their community, the moderate income level. We're not even talking about the low income level because it doesn't work. That's just a statewide issue. Unless you get affordable units, that's a different animal and I really think there's a balance here ultimately it's a supply and demand issue if we have plenty land they'll build plenty units if the cost is low they'll build more if the cost is high they'll weed out some of the builders who don't have the capital because land will cost more. So what I'm trying to say here is we started something here to help our community grow, to help make it more affordable to those who can't afford it. Now are we going to make everything $3 million units? No, because then you kind of move to the extreme of the other side, too high of an income.
So I think this report is good in the sense that it gives us some statistics.
It gives us just some discussion points.
But at the end of the day, it's really the council having to kind of talk to your constituents and decide, are we ready for this? Are we ready to have IHO? Just like some of the communities or neighbors who kind of took the chance and did it before
us.
and now we've kind of folLod step to that. So thank you for your report.
Thank you. Mayor Pro Tem.
Thank you. I appreciate the report.
I want to quickly express appreciation of the COG for,
I believe they provide the funding for this analysis, so appreciate that our partnership with the COG and their work on doing this. On the other studies you've done for cities in the Sangria Valley, the findings, were they similar in terms of feasibility for IHOs in those other cities?
Can you describe that?
Yes. So the findings were very similar, and we had similar, well, those were cities that hadn't yet adopted an ordinance.
And so our general kind of conclusions for those cities was that this was not maybe the most advantageous time for them to adopt an inclusionary housing ordinance.
Are they all at this point not moving forward then within IHO?
We, to my knowledge, none of them are, but we, our contract with the COG is sort of coming to a close, so it's possible they may pursue it separate from that.
But none of them have indicated to us that they're looking to pursue an IHO at this time.
Great. No, I appreciate that.
I mean, it's clear to me, and you've looked through the report and the analysis, one, I appreciate the analysis and being able to be guided by this kind of data and analysis. and I hope that as we go forward, not just on planning and development issues, but across the city, to the extent possible and every time possible, I hope that we'll be guided by data and analysis as much as we can. And ideally, in the timeline of this, we would have this analysis before we adopt an ordinance like an IHO for the city. So hopefully we'll make sure that that's standard practice going forward. but it's clear to me looking through this report that right even market rate without affordability affordable unit components developments in the city do
not pencil out is it that's correct on average sort of your average
hypothetical project yes we would say doesn't look like it pencils out just
again given those average assumptions yeah and given the caveats you gave in
the report right the market can change and these are a point in time kind of analyses and assumptions. Correct. But generally, I don't think market conditions have changed that
much at all, right, much from what we analyzed in the report. That's correct. And so again, just
what I mentioned before is that we can only reflect sort of average costs, average rents,
and so different projects may have different kind of conditions that they're dealing with. Maybe
it's they already had the land, so the land cost, which is one of the cost categories I didn't mentioned might be much Lor. So then, you know, that's not a factor. That's just one example.
So that's just to say that, yes, it looks like projects in general are probably financially
challenged, but it doesn't mean that no project can work. And so just, again, to caveat that.
Yeah, no, I, uh, knowing where there's, there's not a lot of certainty or you can't answer,
right.
There's no certain answers to every development is unique.
Every situation is a little bit, right. Understanding that.
But generally this analysis says to me that the IHO will not get us to where we want to go at this point, given marking conditions.
Yes. And again, we are seeing just generally development is challenged right now.
You know, there are projects that have been in the pipeline that are being built that developers are still moving forward with.
But in terms of new starts, we are generally seeing that the volume of new starts for projects is slowing down.
Again, between the costs and then the sort of interest rate factors,
there is many developers that are taking a pause on moving forward with a new project at this moment.
So I mean back when a few months ago when this council right adopted the IHO and we're having this conversation I really pushed for us to make sure we did this analysis as well in parallel and the result I made clear I hope at that point that the analysis and whatever it came back to us would guide decision making on going forward How we want to implement the IHO and if we want to make any changes It's clear to me with this report and this analysis that we've asked for that the IHO generally is not, with current market conditions, isn't working the way we want it to work. I would support a suspension and it looks like your recommendations for at least a year.
And in the meantime,
I would hope to direct staff and hope that staff will work on some of the recommended changes
to the IHO through the report
to implement those when we're ready. But also to, before we, if this council supports the suspension today of the IHO, the existing IHO, to take advantage of the time that we have between now and whenever
we look at this again.
To continue and conduct an analysis, we need to adjust the budget to make sure we have the resources for that to adjust and make some changes to the IHO to make sure it addresses some of the recommendations for changes to make it qualify for state density bonuses
and others to align there.
and if we need to adjust the in-lieu fee calculation and I think bring back to the council for a policy discussion on how, when, and where, right?
We want to adopt an IHO for the city kind of going forward a year from now
or whenever I would support a year.
I don't see market conditions changing dramatically 12 months from now, right? We don't know, but I think that will give time for staff to to conduct additional thinking looking at other cities and what we're doing
and do another analysis along these lines to make sure that the niho will work in our community to
bring their four units we know we need to have and build in the city but without freezing development
where we get absolutely nothing and right freezing the pipeline for a year freezes the pipeline for
development for many years right so I want to be very cautious and to I think
Councilmember Ngo's point right we're trying to strike a balance here I think
inappropriate balance would be to suspend I would support suspension of the IHO as draft as we've implemented now and direct staff to take the time and the admit and take advantage of the time to do some additional analysis and some homework on what other cities are doing on I chose continue to watch more CONDITIONS AND COME BACK TO COUNCIL WITH SOME PROPOSALS FOR ADOPTING OR POTENTIAL CHANGES THE I HAD SHOW AND WHEN WE ARE READY TO READOPT OR UNDO THE PAUSE AND MAKE SURE IT'S IMPLEMENTED IN THE PROPER WAY TO TO GET TO WHERE WE NEED TO GO ON ON THE RENA NUMBERS AND MAKING SURE WE'RE GETTING THE THE HOUSING AND DEVELOPMENT WE WANT AND NEED IN THE CITY AT DIFFERENT LEVELS OF AFFORDABILITY THAT'S ALL I GOT
Thank you.
Thank you for the report. I think that it was very useful for us to hear the results of that report in terms of how we move forward. It still doesn't change the fact that we desperately need affordable housing, not just in our community but throughout the state. I teach, and I've been teaching in this community for 22 years.
and one of the schools are microcosms of what,
and you see what types of societal issues are happening.
And we know for a fact,
and we work closely with our school districts
and the community,
we know for a fact that families are leaving.
And the number one factor
why families are leaving these communities
is because it's not affordable.
When I started teaching at Alhambra High School, our biggest issue we had was we didn't have enough classroom space
because we had so many students.
We almost had 4,000 students at O'Hambra High School.
Today we have barely 2,000.
So where have those 2,000 students gone?
They have either left the state
or they moved to different parts of the state where it's cheaper to live. And a lot of that has to do with families,
and you shared some of those numbers.
What can our community afford? and that $1,700 a month that you shared, I don't know if you can find a unit in the city at that cost. And so we know we also have to strike a balance here, but I do want to say that whether we decide today to suspend the IHO, it doesn't end the fact that we have a desperate housing crisis, not just in our community, but in the entire nation, And to Councilmember Ngo's point, it's really a supply and demand issue.
We desperately need more housing. There's no doubt about it.
We need more housing.
But we also need affordable housing. Because if we're just building million-dollar condos throughout the state, I don't know many families who can afford that.
right so
I also want to speak to council member Ngo's point about also making sure that we're engaging our community because
we do have a
community members that have been working on this for years and I think that
they their input should
should also be taken into account as well
but
we also know that we have areas of the city that we want to see developed
that we are desperate for development
as well. And I know that at the moment it seems like an IHO is not necessarily what we need in terms of getting housing. And so I'm also in agreement in terms of, to the Mayor Pro Tem's point, suspending the IHO at least for a minimum of one year to see and give us enough time to see
what the market conditions are like within a year. Maybe interest rates might dramatically
drop. Maybe we won't go into a recession, right? And everything will be alleviated,
and perhaps we might be in a much better situation where we could potentially adopt an IHO. And other potential, to the Mayor Pro Temp's point, a lot of other potential policy pieces that we can add that will still get us to where we need to be. So I am also in favor for the time
being suspending for at least a minimum of one year the IHO and come back and give staff
direction to come back in a year to see where we're at, and maybe before even a year, maybe somewhere at a midway point, see where we're at and where we want to proceed in the following
six months. Do we have a motion? Yes. Oh, another comment? Council Member Loon?
Yes. Well, two questions.
First question, Director Jessica. Currently, are we under our housing element or our IHO or our general land use plan, are we capitalizing fully on the density and parking ratios that the state allows us to?
Yes, Council Member Lo.
We do have a couple of developers that are proposing projects that are using the incentives provided by the density bonus ordinance.
and just to add to Julie's point about various factors
as to what makes a project feasible. We do have a couple projects where these
of that they are using the density bonus incentives to add more density in order
to provide affordable units. So you're saying that those who have interest and seems to be willing to I guess submit a concept is because they
purchased the land a while back when market conditions were different and
and so therefore their only concern is construction and labor costs?
Yes.
I see.
Okay.
And then my second question is, given that, you know, the state did, HCD did approve our housing element, does any suspension even temporarily impact our housing element that will approve the state?
Will there be any issues?
I don't foresee any because the housing element indicates that the city will consider an inclusionary housing ordinance. And the city did consider it, did adopt it.
And I believe if you pause it, I don't believe it's contrary to what's in the housing element.
But Carl, if you would love to jump in and if you have additional comments on that, feel free to jump in.
Only if the mayor and council want me to jump in.
I'm happy to discuss it.
I think mainly the council has already fulfilled its obligation under the housing element to adopt an inclusionary housing ordinance.
There's nothing in our housing element that requires us to enforce that ordinance
or the regulations, and indeed, HCD wouldn't be able to force that in any event. So if the council wishes to provide direction to my office and to the city manager's office, not to enforce that for a period of time, that's certainly within your legislative power today.
To answer that point too, right, with this analysis, it's clear that many of these developments within an inclusive housing ordinance, in effect, will not pencil out anyway. So in effect, we would have no housing.
This is one of the issues that I think many cities deal with with regard to the edicts coming down from Sacramento with regard to affordable housing is that they are not necessarily data-driven. They are instead policy-driven without data. And when we, being collectively the local agencies, are faced with trying to enforce those particular ideas, when you try to get the data, you discover that the data may not support the policy necessarily. it's always i mean to cut through this the study there's always the the factor which is it's going to cost x if you pay if you pay y for something that that costs x the delta between the x and the y has to be paid for somebody so where does that delta go to and of course it's tacked
onto x which of course increases the the gap between the have and the have nots in the market which is basically the problem,
and contrary to actually what the intent of the council is and what the intent of the state is
in order to produce more affordable housing.
Initial quick question, if the mayor is okay with it.
For Carl or Jessica, for larger developments, right,
if we suspend enforcement of the IHO for 12 months, any larger developments above, I don't know what our threshold is,
would still be subject to negotiation of a development agreement
where we could negotiate certain community benefits
out of those projects still, right? Yes, that's correct.
So we can still work. There's still opportunities to negotiate potential affordable units or other kind of benefits
into an affordable housing trust fund
or something else for the city with larger developments. Suspending the ISO does not preclude us from negotiating with developers who want to build larger projects in the city, which would have been subject to the IHO anyway. With that, I'm happy to make a motion to adopt, I'm not sure if this is a staff recommendation or the analysis recommendation to temporarily pause and force the IHO for 12 months, but for city staff to take the analysis, to do additional research and homework on IHOs in the region, how they're working, continue to monitor market conditions,
and well before 12 months,
hopefully, I don't know, nine months or whatever, come back to Council with recommendations for potential changes to the NYHO to be adopted by the Council going forward and an analysis of our conditions, whether it's feasible or not.
Before we take a vote, Joe, just procedurally,
again, you know, out of respect for our planning commissioners, I mean, if we are going to use this time to use this analysis as a reference as well as modern market conditions, will we also still confer with the Planning Commission?
Council Member Lo, I would say yes. Any changes to, because they originally went to Planning Commission,
we would recommend that it go to Planning Commission again for any amendments.
And then they would make a recommendation to City Council on any amendments that would be brought forward to you. Okay.
I just want to clarify that because I think that is important to all of us given that the work was put in. And I think that we need to also acknowledge the work they put in. And also demonstrate that we value their collaboration with us for decision making.
If that motion was clear, the motion is still on the table if there's a second.
and seconded by Councilmember Yu.
If we can take a vote, please.
Oh, should we?
Oh, we have a split vote.
Councilmember Lo, yes. Councilmember Lo, no.
Councilmember Ngo, no.
Mayor Pro Tem Wong, yes.
Mayor Sanchez, yes. Councilmember Yu Yu, yes.
Council member, yes.
Motion passed. All right. Thank you.
So we'll go ahead and jump to item. Good discussion. Thank you so much for the report.
Thank you for being here and for your time.
And we look forward to seeing you soon. Thank you.
We'll go ahead and jump to item 2C.
Yeah. Almost. Almost there.
Mr. Mayor, members of the council, we have Sean Igoe, our director of public works.
He's joining us by Zoom tonight.
So we're going to make sure that Sean could hear us and we could hear Sean while we're prepping the slides.
I can hear you.
I think we have public comment for item 2C.
Is that correct? Yes. How many speakers? Two. One written and one oral.
Okay, if we can do those first before the presentation.
Okay, first speaker is me.
Hi, neighbors. It's Michelle.
I am speaking as a resident tonight on this item. For many of you who are not aware, this is me. restating my protest of this item. Many of our neighbors and me have protested this item for several years now.
And for those of you who aren't familiar,
what this item is in regards to is the 710 Freeway, as you know, ends west of us. And so our communities in South Pasadena, Pasadena, and El Serino have been very successful in thwarting the extension of that freeway. which unfortunately has meant that a lot of commuters who have to exit that freeway, they tend to, we often see them in our city, cutting through as a means to getting to the east. As our neighbors and I, we have warned regarding that traffic, some of our elected officials, and I fear tonight, they will approve the further redirection, of the 710 commuter traffic onto Garvey. And so, you know, there are concerns because Garvey is impacted,
and by further impacting that with commuter traffic from the 710 freeway,
they're further also eliminating parking lanes
so that they can accommodate that extra traffic along with that pollution.
it's very frustrating for me
sorry I didn't prepare any comments but it's very frustrating for me to hear this
because I also hear
our elected officials threatening to find property owners on the street
because they have vacancies
and so measures such as this it seems to go against
assisting them and their businesses
because they're impacting them even further
than already because now there will be congestion on the street.
Commuters are not interested in stopping. They just want to go home as quickly as possible.
People who would have been interested in stopping at their places of business
will no longer want to go there because why would you want to go into the traffic? You'd want to avoid it.
And patrons that want to go to their shops now because they're going to be parking structures because there's no longer parking on the street,
They're going to have to walk maybe a block or so to get to the stores.
Why come to Monterey Park when you can go to Alhambra, San Gabriel,
and just exit your vehicle right in front of the shop and go in there?
And so that's a concern.
You're not helping these businesses or these property owners.
You're hurting them even further. And I also wanted to add to my neighbor's comment in regards to bike lanes,
noting the new bike lanes that are included in this proposal on Newmark and Emerson.
There's just no thought. It's so unintentional the way that we just scatter our bike paths amongst residential neighborhoods to nowhere.
These little tiny scattered bike paths to nowhere.
It's just so thoughtless.
I don't understand why we don't act.
you know we know our communities don't act in silos our cities are connected why aren't we
working with la county to devise a plan that creates a master bike plan that connects all these cities and creates paths that go actually somewhere purposeful and that you know connects
transit hubs that connects locations that people actually need to go to instead of all these little
random bike pass to nothing.
So this is what happens. This is what happens, neighbors, when you don't pay attention
and they know they can get away
with approving whatever.
So it behooves us all to pay attention and to speak up when you don't agree and you know what to do if you're not happy with it. So please, please help me.
Thanks.
one written communication from bill lamb sorry i have to read this so i just want to say that
how does the sr 710 funding work out if you no longer include the lane expansion on garvey avenue
because i still strongly oppose the lane expansion on garvey avenue because it would create too much traffic congestion there, and it takes away on-street parking as well. In terms of funding, you should include the funding on public transit on Monterey Pass Road because it's been three years since Metro Line 258 was moved away from Monterey Pass Road to Floral Eastern, and now people living near or work on Monterey Pass Road would have a hard time walking down
to either Floral, Garvey, or Hellman to catch an alternative route to get around.
The Spirit bus service on Monterey Pass Road is so very inconvenient
because Route 4 runs southbound on Monterey Pass Road only between Garvey and Davidson,
and using Route 5 to get to Cal State LA takes a long time instead of short.
The segment on Floral and Eastern is already served by East LA Shuttle
as well as Montebello bus line Route 10, which had extended from ELAC to CSULA by Eastern and Cesar Chavez since November 5, 2023.
So in closing, I strongly urge all of you to tell the Metro line that 258 should return back to Monterey Pass Road instead of Floral and Eastern
because the current segment is duplicated with East LA Shuttle, which also runs on Flora and Eastern as well as Monobel bus lines, Route 10. That's it. No other comments.
I'm sorry. We'll go ahead and proceed with the report. Thank you, Sean.
Thank you, everyone.
Good evening, Honorable Mayor, Mayor of Pro Tem and City Council. Sean Igo public works director apologize for not being there in attendance in person
But we do have Zia Mazbooty from transtech who's in person and we'll aid in the questions Are you declaring a conflict on this?
What was that?
Sorry, mr. Mayor members of the council. I think councilmember had
Member go ahead a conflict on this correct me if I'm wrong. Yeah, I think there's two of us that have
circumstance has to do with his employer's ownership of property that's within the vicinity my understanding council member to go is that yours has to do with a personal property interest
i'm within a thousand feet of the corner of right and so there's a specific analysis for a thousand
feet uh one of which is intensification of traffic and this specifically has to do with traffic and the potential for affecting your your property interest with regard to that so my advice is to recuse yourself on this item and obviously you can hear it in the back room.
I'll be in a penalty box. All right. Thank you.
Enjoy the snacks back there.
We'll go ahead and proceed.
Thank you, Sean. Thank you. As I was saying, Ziyad is filling in as our CIP manager and plays a significant role in all the projects
you are seeing completed throughout the city, including the ones discussed tonight.
Next slide, please.
I have before you an item for the Garvey capacity improvement and parking structure projects.
As part of this, we will provide you some background on the I-710, SR-710, and 710
mobility improvement projects. Provide an overview on the Monterey Park projects, which includes
projects that are in design, in progress, and ones currently being reviewed for further consideration.
Next slide, please. The current 23-mile stretch of 710 was built in 1964,
leaving a 4.3 mile gap to be completed at a later date. The end of the 710 is sometimes referenced as 710 stub.
This presentation is not intended to provide details on the 710 stub, but rather the projects that Monterey Park is working on to aid in traffic congestion as it relates to the 710 not being completed. It was originally intended to be fully completed. However, in 2017, Metro voted not to fund the completion of the project due to costs and rather reallocate $780 million to mobility improvements in the San Gepo Valley. Of this, Monterey Park received over $100 million to complete their own mobility improvement projects. Next slide, please. As it relates to Monterey Park, you can see here that in 2017, we submitted our first round of projects, which were then approved by Metro the following year in 2018. The second round of projects were submitted and approved by Metro in 2019. three funding agreements were approved in 2021 and 2022 and finally last year the monterey pass road improvement projects agreement was executed which will we will relate in the presentation next slide please now when we get into the projects and the status of these projects the adaptive response
traffic signal project will include atlantic garfield and garvey and will aid in synchronizing
these major thoroughfares and improve traffic flow congestion thus far the traffic signal and
inventory existing operation assessment analysis of current operations and maintenance needs
has been completed we have now moved to analysis of a concept of operation development of system
engineering management plan and working with caltrans la county and neighboring cities next
Next slide, please. This map depicts the three streets as part of the project, which will include adaptive traffic signal control systems and upgrade existing traffic signals to current
standards that signalize intersections. Once the system engineering management plan is
completed, over the next several months, we will move to design, which is anticipated
to take 6 to 12 months, with construction to follow, adding an additional year before COMPLETION FOR A TOTAL OF TWO TO THREE YEARS BEFORE COMPLETION OF THIS PROJECT. NEXT SLIDE,
PLEASE. ADDITIONAL PROJECTS THAT WERE APPROVED AND IN PROGRESS INCLUDE THE GARVEY AVENUE IMPROVEMENT PROJECT, MONITORI PASS ROAD PROJECT AND GARVEY LINKON PARKING STRUCTURE PROJECT. NEXT SLIDE, PLEASE.
THE GARVEY AVENUE PROJECT INCLUDES PROVIDING AND ADDING ADDITIONAL AMENITIES SUCH AS BUS SHELTERS,
benches, adjusting existing medians and lengthening left turn pockets along Garvey with repaving
and restriping to follow.
The project also promotes bicycle use by adding bicycle routes on parallel streets of Emerson and Newmark and EV charging stations where feasible. It also improves signal infrastructure, evaluates timing and synchronization of signals. This project originally evaluated the removal of parking along Garvey.
However, this has been removed from the project scope as we heard and listened from the community
about the impacts of this portion of the project.
This will go out for design in the next 6 to 12 months and then go into construction,
which is anticipated to take an additional 6 to 12 months.
Next slide, please.
Monterey Pass Road. This project includes improvements to traffic flow, operations and safety of vehicular traffic,
bicycles and pedestrians.
It also includes traffic signal improvements, synchronization, improved bus stops, construction
of bicycle lanes, and finally repaving and restriving and signage.
This item is a few years out because of construction that is slated to start in the near future
by Southern California Edison for an underground project.
We will have the project designed and ready for construction once their project is completed. Next slide, please.
Garvey and Lincoln Parking Structure.
This project will increase available parking in the downtown area and provide wayfinding signage to get to the structure. The structure is currently estimated to have 300 parking spaces and will include amenities such as ADA parking spaces, EV charging, and bike racks. This will take a few years to complete once the final design is completed. Next slide, please.
Finally, there are three projects that were originally presented in Metro that are being reevaluated. This includes the Ramona Road Improvement Project, Atlantic Avenue Improvement Project, and Garfield Avenue Improvement Project. These projects include parking reductions, and as we saw with the Garvey Avenue Improvement Project, there is not an appetite for reducing or eliminating parking. We want to reassure our community that we hear and understand your concerns related to parking impacts due to these projects.
With that, staff will be working with Metro to evaluate alternative projects where these funds can be used to assist in reducing congestion in Monterey Park.
Much like all of these projects, we will continue working with the community as we move forward. With that, we can answer any questions.
Thank you, Sean, for that report.
Any questions or comments from Council?
Mr. Mayor? Council Member Lo, go ahead.
Sean, again, thank you for your staff report from Zoom. But again, I know it's already in the slide, but again, just to be clear, For Garvey Avenue, we are not talking about adding any additional lanes or taking away parking, right?
We are not doing that. That is correct. The only quote-unquote lane additions would be extension of the left-turn pockets. But again, that's to help reduce congestion.
But there is no reduction or elimination of parking or adding additional lane.
Okay. I'm kind of curious.
I know in looking at the analysis, especially some of the public bike routes that I believe are east-west,
is it possible to also add north-south?
Because, you know, especially if we're trying to encourage people to take public transportation, and I would imagine that if you had an east-west that also connects with some north-south routes onto Garvey, then that also does encourage people to ride your bicycle to a bus stop
and possibly take a metro bus.
Yes, we will definitely evaluate this as part of the project. Again, we still have design components
that need to be completed as part of this, and so this can be incorporated into the final design.
I mean, that's my suggestion is that, again, you know, we do want us to be robust and, you know, providing mobility alternatives. And I think that's where, yeah, it has to make sense where it also means, you know, ways to get out of your car. It means bicycling, it means also taking more public transit. And I think that's something that, you know, we should definitely make sure to look into.
Absolutely.
Okay. I mean, just for now. I may have more questions, but those are my questions for now.
Thank you, Council Member Lo. Council Member, you? No. Mayor Potemwine?
Thank you, Sean. I appreciate this report.
And actually, your report is making clear to me that we are further along than I actually
thought on some of these projects, which I appreciate.
For, well, one, for Monterey Pass, I mean, I know that it sounds like the Edison project is going to delay some of the street improvements that are already planned and programmed for the Metro funding. But we are planning to resurface the street based off of the damage from the ICZON.
Yes, that's correct. We are doing some interim repaving.
And then, like I said, within a few years, once SC has completed their underground project,
then we'll go back and do these improvements. So we're still several years out before the Metro
or the Monterey Pass project is completed. So it'll give a few years of the temporary road repairs,
and then we'll go back and then do final road repairs
and redesign to incorporate the improvements I discussed. Okay, thank you.
If there's any opportunity or way to accelerate that, I'm worried, I mean, we had part of the discussion during the housing conversation around construction, labor cost escalation, right? The more time passes, I would expect, I've never experienced deflation in cost construction. So it's only going to get more expensive, and we have a set amount of funding set aside from Metro for this. I don't want to get to a point where we won't have enough funding to complete a project that we've already planned if this has to go out further and further in terms of a timeline. If there are opportunities to accelerate any of this to make sure that we can get these projects done under the existing funding we have from Metro,
I think that would be ideal.
And then just to clarify, it sounds like that this agreement does approve, right, moving forward with the parking structure specifically on Garvey and Lincoln, but we don't have, and we have, it sounds like we have a preliminary design, but no final design for that and the other Garvey Avenue improvements, right?
That's correct.
Are we planning, sorry, Zeon beat you by nodding his head, but are we planning any additional community outreach on the preliminary design and potential input from the community and the business community, particularly on Garvey and Atlantic and Garfield? If there are other design elements we want to make sure we integrate into this,
there will be opportunities to provide that input, right?
Yes, we will provide additional opportunities for the community to provide input
as part of these projects.
Great, and I know you will,
but please keep the council apprised THOSE OPPORTUNITIES. I'M SURE THERE WILL BE A LOT OF INTEREST IN THE FINAL AND HELPING TO FINALIZE THE DESIGN FOR GARVEY, MONTEREY PASS, ATLANTIC, GARFIELD AND THE PARKING STRUCTURE AS WELL. I KNOW THAT THINGS WILL ULTIMATELY EVOLVE AND CHANGE IN THE YEARS THAT IT WILL TAKE TO FULLY BUILD OUT ALL THESE PROJECTS. BUT I WANT TO MAKE SURE THERE'S AS MUCH COMMUNITY BUY-IN AND SUPPORT FOR THESE PROJECTS BECAUSE ONE, A LOT OF PEOPLE WILL BE INCONVENIENCE DURING THE
the construction phase of this,
as we experienced from North Atlantic
over most of last year,
and we'll need everyone's patience and understanding during that period, but also wanna make sure that this is something the community has input in and ownership over
in terms of the final design. Absolutely.
I guess a hypothetical question,
if, right, once we have final design and construction costs have a better idea of final construction costs and all that stuff
if they ultimately come in higher than the funding that's allocated from metro for these specific projects what what are our options we're thinking around how we would might address the funding gap
um well we could like metro and ask for additional funding or we may have to find additional funding
options all right so just more urgency to making sure we come in within the the funding opportunity that's available from Metro.
On the bike lanes,
I mean, this was made by one of the speakers and actually an earlier speaker
during public comment around protected bike lanes as we are designing bike lanes. Well, one, taking a step back. Does the city currently have a master bike plan
for the entire city?
Has that recently been updated or is that kind of an older?
It hasn't been recently updated,
but there's a bike plan
within the region. So we will be evaluating that. And, you know, it's hard, even if you have a
master bike plan, it's hard to implement all of those options and you have to kind of piecemeal
projects together. Unfortunately, we're overlaying, you know, an additional element to existing infrastructure and sometimes it gets a little complicated, but we definitely will be evaluating
protected bike lanes to the previous speaker's comments earlier about Petrera Grande. And again, excellent point. We have space there. On Monterrey Pass, we have space there.
So we always evaluate the best options for our community to make sure that not only that our community is protected, but also visitors protected as they travel through our city.
Have we, I know it was the odds trying to see something, but have we, right, we are planning currently, right, parallel to Garvey, some potential bike lanes, right? Are those, is that thinking integrated into our existing bike plan or is that something we need an update for the bike plan.
That all differs to the odd, but I believe that we would have to incorporate some of these changes to our bike plan.
So I would just make the point, right, we want to make sure one, that bike plans or the bike paths that we eventually build out are safe and to the extent possible and as much as possible protected bike lanes, that would be my preference. Two, make sure they connect somewhere and to each other, right.
Thank you.
Building Out Protective Bike Lanes or Striped Bike Lanes that don't connect to each other are essentially useless because no one's going to use them because they're not going to feel safe going from one one area of bike lanes to another area of bike lanes if there's no protected linkage. So to the extent possible if we can update our master bike plan for the entire city and make sure that links to I know there's a regional bike plan going on that we're trying to we have made efforts to try to coordinate with so they connect outside of the city to and help reduce car traffic. like vehicle traffic and vehicle miles traveled. Let's do that if we need to, if the council needs to address that from a funding perspective to resource that, please do.
I would totally support that.
So yes, let's update the bike plan for the entire city
and make sure we're starting to implement where we can these elements and make sure, preference would be for protected bike lanes
as much as possible.
because even the marked bike lanes on Alhambra Avenue and others,
they're just not used.
People are going and riding their bike where they can and taking their life in their own hands, either riding on the sidewalk or on the street right now, even with drawn bike lanes or striped bike lanes.
Most people don't feel safe riding in those kind of lanes. I don't either.
so to be clear
Monterey Pass Road, Garvey other than the traffic signal improvements and synchronization that's part of this plan all the rest of the designs
are preliminary and we'll
still be seeking additional community input on the final designs right?
That is correct.
If that's the case
I fully support this and want to add
the sense of urgency that we need to address this with otherwise we're going to be sitting a few years from now with nothing or either nothing built or half built and we're gonna run out of money from Metro with cost escalation on labor and construction costs so to the extent we can accelerate these projects and other projects that we're waiting on to get these done let's do that and if we need to bring in additional resources or I spend some money up front to make sure we get this done faster I think the count I would be open to that and I hope the council would be open to that as well
Thank you, Sean, for that report. I'm excited to see we've got a lot of our projects in the works already. To a couple of the points that were being made, I'm looking at the bike master plan that we have, and it definitely could use some updating. I know it's 10 years old now, or it's nearing 10 years old. but I think that this is a great opportunity to be able to re-look at the plan and see how we can expand it and update it, especially as we're heading into next month into our strategic planning meetings in terms of what we want to focus on. This would be a great time to be able to talk about how we can use multimodal forms of transportation, particularly making our city, and we've talked already a lot about how we can make Monterey Park a lot more pedestrian friendly, make it a lot safer for pedestrians. I know that I do a lot of walking within the area that I live in around Elac with my daughters, and part of the reason why I like that area is because the sidewalks are very large and makes it a lot easier to, whether you're biking or walking, But we also know that most of our streets and sidewalks are not that way in the city. So we do need to find ways to make our city a lot more safer and a lot more accessible for pedestrians and bicyclists and anyone else who is using our streets, whether you're walking your dog or strolling your three daughters in a double stroller. it just needs to be a lot safer
to be able to access different parts of the city I like walking not just to
ELAC but the South Atlantic Square
I go there and I shop
with my daughters as well
so being able to get there in a safe manner
I know there's certain pockets that aren't
necessarily that safe I know how to navigate it to the Mayor
Pro Temp's point, sometimes you take your life into your own hands
in situations like this.
But anyhow, it would be a great opportunity
to get also community input in terms of how we develop this master plan,
how we can interconnect our city. So if you're a student and you're biking from Mark Keppel High School
to different parts of the city, whether it's your home, the library,
ELAC, trying to get to the metro station at the other side of our city, it just needs to be a little bit more
INTERCONNECTED.
AND I THINK THAT WOULD SERVE US WELL IN TERMS OF HOW WE ENVISION
OUR CITY IN THE FUTURE.
SO I'D LOVE TO REVISIT THIS BIKEMASTER PLAN, IF WE CAN HAVE
STAFF LOOK INTO THIS IN TERMS OF HOW WE UPDATE THIS AND WHERE WE'RE KIND OF AT WITH THIS. QUESTION? COMMENT?
IF I MAY ADD SOMETHING. SO WE RECEIVED A MILLION-DOLLAR GRANT FOR SAFE STREETS FOR ALL. That grant's purpose was to develop Vision Zero guidelines for the city. We're going to have a safe walk to school. And then we have the city council has opted complete street ordinance as part of our metro program. And we are part of this grant is to develop a complete street guidelines, et cetera. And we can definitely incorporate because that looks at pedestrian, bicyclists, et cetera, and their safety. So we will be looking actually in the next month, hopefully, I'm putting out a request for proposal to hire a consultant to develop all of this for us. So everything you guys have talked to, we are thinking about. We are trying to keep things moving and to provide Vision Zero, which the goal is to have zero fatalities in the city, accidents, et cetera, and to protect our residents. So we will look at, and we're doing Portero Grande as the gentleman talk. I have a project, another RFP going out shortly to do the MATCYCLE 1 grant that we got. We're connected to Rosemead, Montebello, and LA County, and it's part of a master plan. So we do look, and there was a lot of work that took place as part of the regional San Gabriel Valley bike master plan. It was detailed. We can look at it and evaluate if anything changes to update it. But it was a very thorough master plan that connect us from point A to point B to neighboring cities. So people that are going through our community or going to neighboring cities, the master plan did look into this. But we can absolutely look into that as well. Thank you. Mr. Mayor.
And just one last thing.
And then just my last comment is just in terms of the structure. I know we still have time to kind of look at how we want to design that, what types of things we want to include. So I'm all in favor of bringing this back and getting community input as well.
Council Member Love. Sure, thank you.
And again, I have some agreement that, you know, I think community input is important as well as updates to our bike master plan.
Let me ask you, given that we do have funding from the focus on Vision Zero and Complete Streets,
Can that funding also be used to evaluate this project to make sure that it also conforms with our goals and vision for a Vision Zero and Complete Streets mobility policy for this specific project?
Well, that grant is specific to developing the plan and the guideline. It's not to review. So it's going to give us specific guidelines to follow, et cetera.
But this project itself, we will be looking into it. We will absolutely seek community input in any of these projects. We want the community buy-in into them.
So as we move on project, we'll bring them, we'll do some sessions to show people what we're proposing and how we want.
Because we want their input because they're going to be our users of whatever we're doing.
So we assure you that we will share with the community what we have before we proceed.
Well, let me ask you, so I'm glad to hear that we are working on a complete streets plan,
but what is that timeline, though? What is that timeline?
When will the council actually see what is proposed?
What is our timeline for that?
We just got the agreement in December approved because we were working with Metro,
so this is a federal grant, and it's going to be managed by Metro.
We just received it, and I'm in the process right now of packaging it. So I'm hoping in February we put out the RFP, and then we'll hire a consultant, and then we'll start working on it.
And I'm actually presenting tomorrow to the Traffic Commission what we're doing on this. So we want the community to be aware that we are trying to make a lot of traffic safety improvements in the community.
And that's important because I think, well, my colleagues and the honest will know, I mean, in the past, we've had people come up here on certain streets which are a concern of pedestrian safety. And I think that that's important that we are, you know, it's one thing to adopt a resolution saying we believe in a vision zero and complete streets, but another to actually put that vision into an actual plan. So.
Thank you.
Any other comments or questions?
I'M HAPPY TO MAKE A MOTION TO ADOPTING STAFF RECOMMENDATION ON THIS ITEM WITH SOME INITIAL PUBLIC INPUT ON FINAL FOR POTENTIAL DESIGN ELEMENTS. ONE, WOULD LOVE TO LOOK AT SIDEWALK WIDENING, ESPECIALLY ON GARVEY.
AND THERE ARE PORTIONS OF GARVEY.
I CAN'T RECALL HOW FAR THIS PRODUCT IS SUPPOSED TO GO, BUT RIGHT CLOSER TO KASUDA CANYON, THERE ARE PORTIONS OF THE SIDEWALK THAT DON'T EXIST. and looking at potential options there to make sure that there is sidewalk. But sidewalk widening in the downtown area, especially to enable potential outdoor dining and other sidewalk and walkability uses and improvements and helping to shorten the distance when you're crossing the street as well for pedestrian safety. And then also, I don't know if we are looking at this, but if we can integrate other climate-friendly, right cool pavement potential ideas and other climate friendly materials into our thinking in terms of construction materials for for these and other design elements I know we're looking already at street or street tree kind of changes to Garvey and other parts of the city and integrating other cooling or cooling rate treatments for the built environment as we're looking at the sustainability plan make sure we're implementing or integrating what's I I imagine will come out of the sustainable plan into the design elements for Garvey and our streets with this funding as well. But look forward to the community engagement that's going to come too.
So a motion has been made? Yes. I'll second it.
Seconded by Council Member Lo if we can take a vote.
Approved unanimously.
Thank you.
I THINK WE'RE GOING TO I KNOW WE'VE BEEN GOING FOR A WHILE, SO I'M GOING TO ASK FOR A QUICK BREAK JUST SO WE CAN STRETCH OUR LEGS. SO WE'LL TAKE A QUICK FIVE MINUTE BREAK, RECESS, AND THEN WE'LL RECONVENE.
Thank you.
Thank you.
Thank you.
Thank you.
Thank you.
Thank you.
Thank you.
Thank you.
Thank you.
Thank you.
Thank you.
Thank you.
Thank you.
Thank you.
Thank you.
Thank you.
Thank you.
Thank you.
Thank you.
Thank you.
Thank you.
Thank you.
Thank you.
All right.
All right, we'll go ahead and reconvene.
I mean, I would get a chance to stretch your legs and maybe grab a snack.
We're going to actually move up item 5B up for a discussion,
which is the Sister City Commission report.
we have a report for this?
And we have a comment first, right?
One speaker,
Taquin Charles Ma.
Thank you so much for waiting. I know it's been a while.
Good evening. I'm waiting for a long time to say this. Honorable Mayor,
Mayor Pro Tem, Council members, and city officials. I'm Charles Mao, Chair of the Sister Cities Commission of Monterey Park. Tonight, I will give you a very brief update on the Sister Cities Program of
Monterey Park. And because some issues came up in the last few years, so that motivated the commission to consider restructuring the commission to make the program function better. Now, the Monterey Park Sister City Associations, there are five of them, a network of five
international cities located in China, Japan, Mexico, South Korea, and Taiwan, and a number of friendship cities too, and these together has played a vital part of Montreux Park history going back three decades. The commission was formed, itself was formed 25 years ago, to coordinate all activities among the sister city associations, and together forced a sense of cultural connection to the rest of the world. This people-to-people mission has become even more important among the fast-changing geopolitical landscape we are witnessing today.
The associations, collectively and individually,
have promoted the City of Monterey Park, educational and cultural exchanges, business relations and investment opportunities from overseas, tourism, and also diverse cultural awareness to the City of Monterey Park community. Over the years, the associations in coordination with the City has hosted successful community events, fundraisers, student exchanges, and very formal visits by partner city officials from overseas, and vice versa,
that serve to strengthen the bonds between these cities.
However, in the past few years, we have witnessed challenging, the past few years have been very challenging for the program because of the pandemic.
We saw a dramatic drop in activities and association membership,
coupled with the retirement of key active members among the associations.
For a number of reasons, the association also encountered elevated restrictive rules from the city during this period.
This has further sLod the progress of the individual association to bringing their activities back to levels before the pandemic.
We, the Monterey Park Sister City Commission, request support and assistance from the city to help the associations be more productive, more compliant to regulations, and to assign the resources to the associations to better facilitate positive communication and guidance. Specifically, we request the presence of a liaison council member in our quarterly commission meetings.
As a designated liaison from the City, Honorable Chairwoman Yvonne Yu, we the commission is extending our invitation to you to extend our next meeting on april the second so that we can get to know each other and we look forward to advice and input from you
the end of the pandemic does give us an opportunity to turn a new chapter
We have a few requests to that end.
First, as we observed and foresee the Friendship Cities being a vital element of our program, the Commission has amended the bylaws to make the Friendship Cities Association a full participant, enjoying an equal voice as the sister city associations.
reissue business cards to the commissioners. These are vital tools in facilitating coordination and preparation of all exchange activities.
Last but not least, our commissioners have carefully considered
the issue of acquiring a non-profit 501c3 tax status.
as suggested by the staff here, and found it very difficult to proceed at this juncture due to a lack of resources and manpower among the various associations.
So we suggest a follow-on meeting with the city manager and staff to further discuss this issue.
So with the constructive assistance of the city, we are confident that the Monterey Park Sister City Associations can once again become a vital part of the city. And we very much look forward to working with you.
Thank you very much. Any questions? Are there any questions or comments?
No, we're going to do this stuff. Thank you. Thank you for your comments. Yeah.
Hello, good evening, Mayor, Mayor Pro Tem, and City Councilmembers. Robert Aguirre, Director of Recreation and Community Services, here to give a report on the Sister Cities Commission. As mentioned by the speaker, the Sister Cities Commission was established in 1998, and today is comprised of five separate associations. Those are Kwanzao, China, Nakiketsura, Japan, New Taipei, formerly Yongho, Taiwan, and Morelia, Mexico, and Yongdongpo, South Korea. The mission of the commission is to foster friendship, goodwill, and communication with the sister cities. Also to participate in city cultural events and programs and to serve as ambassadors to our sister cities. Now this commission operates differently than the other city commissions within the city. As mentioned, they do have their own set of bylaws, and they are exempt from the regulations set forth in Montero Park's Municipal Code. I will share that the members of the commission are not appointed by city council members as done by the other commissions, and they do continue to have their own set of bylaws, which does make oversight from the city a challenge. um since 2021 i know the pandemic uh following the pandemic since 2021 the commission has only met five times out of the 15 scheduled meeting and that's including uh virtual meetings that were also planned so five times out of 15 scheduled meetings um as mentioned the the associations are their own organization separate from the city and they have hosted student exchange programs with other countries. Only one of the associations, which is Natsuketsura Japan, is a 501c3 nonprofit, and none of the associations carry a general liability insurance. As mentioned, the city manager and I have asked the representatives from the commission to establish a nonprofit corporation that we a separate entity from the city, and in doing so, having a non-profit organization formed, the city could then establish an operating agreement with that organization and document that relationship. This would remove the liability from the city when the association's organization is conducting their own events or programs separate from the city. So it's recommended tonight that city council provide some direction regarding the structure of the Sister Cities Commission, and I'm available for questions, and I'm sure
the chair of the sister cities commission Charles would also be
open to some questions as well thank you
thank you Robert for that history
I have just a quick question
regarding the five cities how were the cities picked
I know this was done back in 98
is there any history behind that like how these cities were selected
I don't have the history on that.
Yes, Charles, if you want to come.
Can you come up here and speak on the mic, please?
Thank you.
I know that it was started in 90 with three sister cities,
and then two were later added.
I don't know the history on how those cities were chosen, though.
As far as I know, the sister city proposal is started by members of local communities who have connections to the cities in the other countries. Okay. So they generate a proposal to establish a sister city with that particular foreign city in that country. Okay. And then the contact will be established between the two, between the governments, I suppose, yeah, representatives of the two cities. And then their negotiations and then back and forth until they sign, agreed that they are indeed suitable for each other. And then they sign a memorandum of understanding. and after one or two years they just signed a formal agreement to be sister cities formally that's how that's how this started usually
thank you for that, are there any questions or comments from Council Member Long? thank you for your patience and also for representing our community in these commissions, I have a question
actually thank you for answering that question by the Mayor about
how we even established these associations.
But I actually have a question.
So, I mean, since 1998, we're not talking about over 25 years.
Each sister city, do they, like, renew these MOUs,
or do they kind of do an evaluation to see how effective they are?
No, I don't think there's a requirement to renew the agreement.
It's kind of like a permanent.
Okay. Yes.
And the reason I ask is because, and as you heard in Robert's presentation, we refer to Yongho as now New Taipei City because my understanding, so last year I actually traveled to Taiwan in October. I actually said, oh, this may be a good opportunity to go visit Yongho. It was in my own research that I discovered that in 2010, Then, Yang Ho stopped being a city, and it became incorporated into new Taipei City, which then, probably the question for me is, well, wait a minute. I mean, last year was 2023, so that means since for 13 years, there has been no Yang Ho. Yet, we continue on our website to list Yang Ho as a sister city, and we act as if it's still an entity, and yet no one seems to be able to, when I ask, well, who exactly are we in contact with? no one was able to even answer our question.
And so that's my question is that, you know, I get the reason for the Sister Cities Association.
It's to maintain relations because many of us who have roots from either mainland China or Latin America or in Taiwan. But it surprised me to find out that we had a sister city
for a state that didn't exist anymore.
for a precise answer you have to go talk to the young whole sister city association presently the person who is responsible for that is is Jeremy Elred okay previously you Sabrina Pang, but not right now. It's Jeremy Alred. I don't know whether, I don't really want to say too much because I really don't know the details, but what I understand is that one of these, one of the members actually visited Yongho District like several years ago, and at that time, Yongho is already a part of New Taipei City.
And the official, that district, now it becomes a district of that big city. So I think, I mean, don't quote me, okay,
but my understanding is that they can continue the relationship as a sister city, even though Yongho is no longer a city. Okay. They still would like to maintain that. that relationship with Monterey Park. Is that something written somewhere, like an email or a proposal,
or we have a point of contact? Because, again, on the one hand, we want to empower our residents to be able to do these things, like maintain relations with our partner
from all of the students.
But at the moment, I mean, that's a question I have.
And I know you can't answer because, again, I can't answer it.
But you see that the question that anyone would ask is, well, then if that is true, because, you know, I looked up, I mean, Yang He, which is now part of New Taipei City, which is a city of now 4 million people.
Four million people is almost like the side of L.A. It is the side of L.A. compared to us, a city of 63,000. So, again, that's great if whichever magistrate we're representing that district wants to maintain. But I feel like it would help us if we had a point of contact somewhere written that says, yes, we still want to maintain relations. Because at least from my perspective, it looks like you're now talking about a city that's four million people.
Yes, well, like I said, I really don't know the details.
But so far, our commission has still treated Yung-ho city as one of our sister cities.
That's all I can say.
Okay, fair enough. Thank you.
Even though the answer is not very satisfying.
No, no, no, no. Look, thank you for it. It's 10 to 8 p.m.
I mean, thank you for your patience. No, no, no, seriously. I mean, thank you. And if anyone wants to watch again,
thank you for watching your government in action.
Perhaps I will ask either Sabrina or Jeremy,
get a precise answer from them.
I think that would be helpful. Yeah, thank you.
Yeah.
Thank you. Council Member Ngo?
Oh, I'm sorry. Council Member, you? No, no, no.
Charles, thank you for kind of providing the support for Sister City being on a commission 25 years for you?
No, I was involved in Sister Cities only about 10 years ago.
10 years ago, but that's still 10 years of dedication. And I think where I'm coming from here is I'm new to this, and I appreciate that we have Sister Cities throughout the world. And it's really, to me, it's a cultural exchange of ideas, broadening the relationship probably an extension of what we do here versus what they do there and it's not only the elected officials the students the trades creating a mutual benefit for both cities and i i can understand why these cities were chosen i mean we weren't here the folks before us did that they decided that and that's great and we need to continue those relationships assuming that they're still viable so that particular example i don't think that's viable anymore because at this point i think you lose some track of accountability so what i like to do is i actually you know from for my personal purpose i like maybe our our city staff to kind of look into what what we've been doing in the last 25 years the last 10 years work with charles to figure out a better game plan where we're more directly involved. At the end of the day, there is a sphere of influence because it does have the city of Monterey Park involved and it not only reflects me as an individual, us on the city council, but the entire city. So if we're going to do something with a commission, it's like every other commission we have. They're appointed. They're vetted. There's bylaws. There's accountability. They meet at a certain time and if they don't we figure out a way to make that make that system work it's just hard for me to understand we have something that meets 5 out of 15 times or 10 out of 15 times if you sign up for something we got to be able to
get there so yeah I think yeah I let me explain that yes as I mentioned in my the active members for some of the association have been dwindling to the point that we cannot make quorum. Actually, we tried to meet but we didn't make quorum for quite a few times.
So what happens is that sometimes we will host subcommittee meetings.
you know we just get together in a restaurant or something just discuss things even though we don't really have quote unquote quorum even in those meetings so we try to maintain some sort of a
cohesiveness even without you know being able to make quorum a lot of time but I don't think I that number is uh is under count i think i think it's over under count i think i think it's more
than that you think it's more as far as as far as i know yes more i'm not understanding more
missed meetings or more no i think you're talking about about five meetings out of 16. five out of
15 because that includes that includes any special meetings that were i think
a location within the city's jurisdiction so i believe mr agiri is counting the meetings that
have actually been noticed in accordance with the law uh-huh pursuant to what the law requires so
well i think you stated that that you get together somewhere at restaurants which adds to my concern with regard to the city's oversight of this particular commission this is the only commission that is not subject to the municipal code and to the resolutions that were adopted in 2016, which is the reason that it's an ongoing discussion among staff about the huge concern with regard to liability, not just because of the failure to comply with the Brown Act, but also because, as Mr. Aguirre mentioned, you don't carry your own insurance, which means that you're under the city's umbrella for insurance if something goes wrong. but there's let me just finish my thought on this for for purposes of the city council's discussion which is if something goes we have no idea what what your commissioners are doing uh representing on behalf of the city um i'm looking i've been here since 2009 serving the city and going through my electronic files we're not talking just about sister cities they're also friendship cities i don't know what the friendship cities do um we don't even really have a complete list of what the
friendship cities are and i've seen at least two memorandums of understanding with friendship
cities but those are the only two that have come on to the agenda and i'm looking through my files uh just now running an electronic search i'm meeting minutes demonstrating that former mayors have have gone and signed memory understanding without direction from the city council to
friendship cities that we have never heard of before well and so it's it's from a legal perspective
It is very disconcerting that we have a commission that is not complying with, obviously, with the Brown Act in all circumstances, is not subject to the appointment by the city council, is adopting its own bylaws, is creating its own programs with who knows who.
it's very difficult for me as the city's legal council
to reconcile having a commission like that
while realizing that we live in this particular age
that is extremely litigious. So those are my thoughts,
and I apologize for interrupting your discussion,
but I just thought that should be part of your discussion.
Okay. Thank you. Council Member U? I think you were next.
Mayor Patem?
On that note, I appreciate that, Carl.
And what first, thank you, Charles. I appreciate your service to the city, not just on this commission, but in many other ways that you've helped support the community over many years. But to the staff's point and to Carl's point, I have serious concerns about the way that the Sister Cities Commission is set up currently and operating currently. and as the city attorney has detailed, right, there's tremendous significant exposure of risk for the city in this and in an effort that the city has absolutely no control and no knowledge of what goes on. And if residents want to or any organization wants to establish ties, I think we should and I would love to support right, sister city relationships, friendship city relationships, cultural exchange and potential economic investment and exchange from other entities from throughout the globe. I would love to support that, but it needs to be done in the right way. And the way that this is set up currently, right, doesn't meet those standards that we need and that the city needs to, right, for the fact that when you don't, as chair of the commission, don't even know what some of the other cities are doing and the city representatives are doing for the Sister Cities Commission is a little bit, I'm sure for you frustrating as well, but for the city, right, the staff don't even know what the commissioners are doing as the city attorney was mentioning.
We have no control of these activities,
but we are liable if anything goes wrong with the activities of the commission.
Okay, let me just answer Mr. Berger's comment, okay?
As far as liability insurance is concerned, I don't know whether you are referring to visitors coming over to this country.
Has something happened to them? Let me step in real quick. Is that what you are talking about?
It's not just that.
It's anything.
If a commissioner who isn't appointed by the city council, the Scissor Cities Commission appoints its own commissioners, which is when I learned of this, I was a little bit concerned because there's no oversight and no authority for the city and the city council over the activities of this commission. Meanwhile, every one of these commissioners goes out and historically has had business cards and has represented themselves as part of the city government with sometimes the blessing, the implicit blessing of the city to represent itself. and could be having discussions. You could even be in the city meeting informally and have an accident or whatever, and the city could be liable for some of these issues or even at these activities.
Yeah, let me answer to you in this way.
Yeah, indeed there are instances
when certain sister city associations
and the president or whoever were in charge of the program at the time for that association
have conducted activities which are outside of the realm of what the bylaw restrict them to. I don't want to name names, but that person is already gone.
So we, so I think, I know, I appreciate that, Charles, and appreciate that you guys are, the commission is working to do. The trouble is that the city is not even aware that these things are happening. And so I'm at this point, and given what I know, I would fully support one, suspending the Sister Cities Commission in this entire activity for now, and directing staff to work with you and other members of the existing Sister Cities Commission who are interested. to do research look at what other cities how they conduct sister city relationships uh to do some take a couple months to study and to look at what a model for a sister cities commission should be and how we should refresh this and come back to the city council to recommend action for us to adopt to formalize a new sister city commission and structure going forward but there are a lot of questions i think the council has and the city have and concerns as well that need to be answered
and I want to give and I I'm not yeah I don't want to see the sister cities
Commission go away and and the work over 25 years that you and many others have done to establish stronger ties with cities around the globe just right just push the side I want to build on that in a real way in a substantive way in a positive way but we got to do it the right way and so we need to right address the concerns that the I think the council and the staff have made clear today around the existing structure for sister cities right relationship and what we have going on right now which is not sustainable and we can't continue that way but let's let's take some time take a step back hopefully you and others who are interested can work with the city staff to kind of reform this the commission and this process and this structure so that it's one that's fruitful and actually aligns with all of our goals, our stated goals.
So, Robert, I think what I'm hearing from Council is that
we're all interested in keeping
sister cities but finding a viable way to make this work that is in line with the 2016 resolution that Carl was talking about and makes sure that it's run in a proper way and that it's in line and doesn't put the city in liability.
So maybe we can come back with some type of direction and gives us time to kind of research
and find ways and meet with the commissioners and look at what other, just like the mayor pro tem said, what other cities are doing. I think we currently, and maybe you can speak to this, we have one commission that has already
a 501c, right?
Yeah. Yeah, that's Nachiketsu or Japan. They're an active 5-1c3.
And they are currently operating in the proper way that we expect them to be operating?
Carl?
Mr. Mayor, members of the council, I don't know the answer to that question, which is one of the reasons we're having this discussion.
Might I suggest, just to, relatedly, for the council to consider appointing an ad hoc committee
of two members of the city council to have this discussion. My concern is that, as you know, from my perspective, it's a significant legal exposure, and I am sensitive to the volunteerism demonstrated by the commissioners, and I think perhaps having at least one or two elected officials be involved with this discussion with individuals who have been involved with this very longstanding commission would be helpful in terms of trying to find a path forward. obviously from a purely city attorney perspective we want it completely done with and separated from the city but that may not be the policy decision of the city council and I think having those discussions in combination with the city manager's office and the commission would be
very helpful okay I think that's a good path forward in terms of setting up in ad hoc committee
that can meet within. Is there anyone who...
Okay, Council Member Ngo,
is there some other member that would like to,
or Council Member that would like to participate in this? I'll join the Council Member Ngo. Can I just make one last very short comment? Sure. Okay. Actually, I have rewritten the bylaws in which the city has the authority to deny members of association being commissioners. Okay so that means that that we make this sister city commission and the very association more accountable to the city. So
to supervise our activities so i already made that suggestions uh in in the amended bylaws and uh so so we can work from there look at that look at that bylaws i mean the amend the amendments and then see we can work out some some way to move this forward yeah it sounds like charles you're
very interested in working with city staff to reimagine what this structure and process should look like. So it sounds like you're aminable.
I'm in the middle of it. I might as well just carry until I see something out of it, right?
City manager. Yes, thank you, Mr. Mayor, members of the City Council. Before, in my previous role here as the Director of Recreation, I know I've talked with this commission, and we did have some discussions about paths forward. I appreciate the council members that are willing to sit on an ad hoc committee to work with staff and the commissioners to kind of find a path forward on how we move forward with still honoring cultural exchange. Definitely, I think some of the things that have been brought up before, such as amending the bylaws and or even creating a separate 501c3 nonprofit organization that still has a connection back are all very possible conversations, possible pass forward. Like I said, I think more than anything, we're looking for to do something about the way the current setup is so that we can make sure, as you mentioned, Charles, we know that the difficulty now is finding volunteers that are interested in serving in volunteer capacities. So we definitely appreciate your time in wanting to continue to do this.
we agree and we see it in other
non-profit groups in the city that they're having a hard time as well finding volunteers as people are choosing not to do it any longer so we think even restructuring how this commission is operating and maybe it be more focused where all of the cities are working together versus having these independent associations might be a viable option as well but definitely thank you to the council for this consideration and I think the ad hoc committee moving
forward would be helpful if the council is choosing to do that all right okay just a question
on process do we carl do we need a motion on this to formalize that yes mr mayor members of the
council my suggestion would be to implement the the suggestion that you'd originally done which was to suspend the activities of the commission pending a review by the ad hoc committee consisting
of the mayor and council member no so moved okay seconded by me if we could take a quick vote
Approved unanimously.
Thank you.
Okay, so we're going to go ahead.
Thank you, Mr. Ma for being here today and for sharing that information.
We're going to go ahead and jump to consent calendar items 3A to 3J.
Counsel, are there any items?
And 2B.
Oh, and 2B. Wait. Oh, that's right, 2B. One speaker for 2B.
I'm going to pull 3I for a short discussion.
Okay.
I'll make a motion for the remaining items but if I don't if there's a public comment. Yeah, let's do the public comment first. Which item is it? Good evening again it's Michelle your neighbor, not your city clerk.
I just have two comments one on 3d which is the new since abatement liens for the good view projects so I just want to request that our city council please provide the public updates on your efforts to recuperate the monies that you spent our monies that you spent on this private property so if you could let us know the status of when you finally get our money back from these folks that would be very nice um my other comment is regards to item 3i which is the recycling um eventually rfp i just wanted to ask if um the i don't know if staff can do this if there's a possibility to add in the rfp um one other option um for creative solutions to recycling so right now I believe that the RFP is only going to include either two cart system or three cart system two cart system which is your two bins I I have concerns with that because I I I you know when it's when our recyclables are mixed and they're contaminated I don't know how how well we're able to get the benefits out of that recycling and so the three cart cycle obviously is better because now we're sorting a little bit more, but there's concerns regarding security with that as well as added cost. So if there are other creative solutions that maybe we could solicit from these proposers, that would be very nice, such as maybe secured collection sites that are collected regularly at specific sites throughout the city. So maybe where we could take in our bottles, our our cans, our cardboard, to these collection sites. And so there's not a truck that has to go out to every single household. The household can bring it to those collection sites
or other ideas.
So perhaps if we can add that language
to the request for proposals,
we'll solicit some more ideas.
That's it.
Okay. No other comments.
So I'll make a motion to approve remaining items except for 3A. And including 2B in the consent calendar.
Excellent. Is there a second? Second. Second. But Council Member Yu, if we could please take a vote.
Approved unanimously.
Thank you. So we have a question for 3A by Council Member Gove. Yes.
So my question is this. So tonight we're approving the list and I guess there's 10, right?
That's on. Okay.
So there's a list of 10 companies that applied. They met the specific timeline to apply and they applied and they submitted the qualifiers. And I'm just trying to figure out when we say the qualifiers, what is it specifically we're looking for?
if you can share that.
Hi, good evening, Honorable Mayor, Mayor Pro Tem, and City Council members. My name is Sochi Tipan, Administrative Manager for the Public Works Department. So we are looking at a list of 10 companies that submitted for residential franchise consideration and for commercial franchise consideration. And so the qualification criteria that we evaluated them on was based on the request for qualifications that City Council approved for release back in October of 2023. And part of that qualification criteria included the companies having at least three franchises with other agencies in California. It also asks for their company information, financial information, litigation history. And these were just the minimum basic criteria to be considered to submit applications.
So thank you for clarification. So the question I have is the companies are submitting these applications or basically their resumes. do we staff when i say we staff the staff go through and reconcile the resumes to make sure that they're viable again uh you know trust but verify i know all these companies i mean many of them are in the local cities and they're all over right and i respect every one of them but i just want to make sure when we get an application in if company a says we are worth 50 mil 50 million and we have served 10 cities and there's no litigation our team actually goes and says okay let's take a look at this yes 50 million based on financial reporting 10q public information and yes, you're serving three cities because we call the different cities to make sure you are serving them and you meet the three. And in terms of litigation, yes, there's no litigation because we did a search for litigation and nothing comes up. I just want to make sure we do that from our standpoint.
So the evaluation was done by city staff and our consultants, HF&H consultants who's assisting with the solid waste RFP. So in terms of doing reference checks, like you're saying, we do evaluate the company or the information that they're submitting that they're servicing the cities, but city staff did not personally call the cities to ask.
But we had a vendor who actually did the work.
They did a more thorough review, yes.
Okay. All right.
Okay. Any other questions or comments?
While we're at it, for this RFP, I mean to the point of I think to the speaker's point earlier, are we given the ballot measure right that requires seven years and has restrictions, Are we able to impose potential or make requests in terms of the RFP for the haulers in terms
of recycling?
They have to meet all the state mandates anyway, right? All at a bare minimum. But third bin options for recycling or separate bins for organic waste or other kind of bulky item pickup days or compost, whatever, those kind of things. Are we able to integrate that into the RFP or are we required to stick to basic trash hauling services?
So the RFP program requirements for city services, like you said, do include the minimum state requirements. We also include other city desire services like the bulky item pickup, also like battery recycling at certain locations like fire stations or public facilities. so the city is able to include additional services or program requirements as desired.
And what's the timeline for issuing the actual RFP?
So this RFP is a multi-step process. So like I said, the city council approved the release of RFQ in October, pending city council's approval of the qualified list of haulers. We would notify the haulers whether they met the criteria and made the list or if they did not meet the criteria, and we would release the request for applications and notice inviting those who were deemed qualified to apply for a franchise in the city. And so based on our schedule, We're anticipating the RFA process to take about a month or so with applications due on February 14th. And we would come back to council in March to recommend who the Lost bidders would be for the franchise agreements.
Do you know, I don't know if you have in your slides, but what additional above state mandates we're asking for the bidders to include in their bid, bulky item pickup, whatever?
So some of the things I mentioned, bulky item pickup, battery recycling, community events, similar to how we do quarterly community cleanup events. We're asking for haulers to provide that. Something that changed with recent legislation, obviously, was organics recycling. So providing kitchen pals for all residential customers, increasing outreach and education, also performing route audits to make sure that customers are actually complying with recycling requirements. We're also asking for audits to make sure that everybody is enrolled in services, if not automatic enrollment. So there's a lot of different criteria and requirements that the city is putting to implement an effective trash and recycling program.
Great. For the organic waste diversion requirements, if a city doesn't meet the diversion requirements by the state,
who is the hauler liable or is the city liable for any fines or issues?
Mr. Mayor, members of the Council, the franchise is set up so that if we miss those diversion requirements, that the hauler is responsible for paying any penalties or anything coming down. That said, that's in the contract. Really, the answer to your question is it's the city that's responsible, but of course we've hired a franchisee to take care of the problems that they're supposed to be taking on that burden.
Great. Thank you.
All right, okay any other questions or comments all right, is there a motion?
I'll move a second. All right, if we can please take a vote
Approved unanimously. I just want to give you a heads up. It's almost 11 o'clock if you'd like to extend it. Yes, I was gonna bring that up
It's almost 11 o'clock and I think extending maybe for 30 minutes.
How about midnight? I'm kidding. I think my daughters are already asleep.
We'll start 30 minutes and if we need more we can extend more time.
So move to extend 30 minutes.
We all want to go home. All right, excellent.
So we'll go ahead and jump to new business items.
We have to finish the motion.
Oh, we have to vote on it? Yeah, okay. So if we can please take a vote. We haven't gone this late in a while. He approved unanimously. Excellent.
All right.
Just want to remind council to be mindful of time.
30 minutes. I might have to cut you off if I have to. Oh.
So we're going to go ahead and start with item, sorry, with item 5A. Oh, wait, we're doing 4A. Sorry. 4A.
So I'm going to go ahead and open public hearing on item 4A to consider adopting an ordinance incorporating by reference chapter 7.46 of the LA County Code.
Thank you, Mr. Mayor, members of the Council. The discussion from a substantive standpoint took place at the introduction. As I mentioned at that point, the public hearing is a requirement of the government code.
If you have any additional questions, I'd have to answer them.
Otherwise, I think all of your substantive discussion occurred last time around.
Excellent. Any quick questions or comments?
I will make a motion to adopt the ordinance as staff recommends with a quick note. Obviously, if the staff can continue to monitor LA County's ordinance and if there are changes to that, please bring that back for us to adopt as well.
I'll second.
Seconded by Council Member Ngo, if we can please take a quick look.
Approved unanimously.
Excellent. And now we'll go ahead and jump to new business items. We have item 5A, a resolution of the City Council of Monterey Park.
This is dealing with our appointments to specific organizations.
So I think this is more just a discussion between us, right? A quick discussion between us regarding item 5A.
I know several of us have already been appointed to particular,
and maybe city manager can help us with this,
in terms of where we are at.
Sure. Actually, Cindy, our Deputy City Clerk, is going to help us with this item. But if there's no changes to your appointments, that's what we're asking for tonight. If you are planning to keep your current associations that you are going and attending, that is fine. But if you would like to make some adjustments because the schedule is not working, we definitely know that we have an upcoming
um
hold off on making any assignments to this commission understanding that right now we temporarily suspended this activity that's within your authority to
do so okay and I don't know if we need to necessarily update that one
particularly but given that councilmember go and I've already volunteered
to serve as a as part of that committee are you okay councilmember go with just
Okay, so Council Member Ngo will be the representative for Sister City Commission,
and I'll be the alternate for Sister Cities, just since we already discussed this anyway. SGV Mosquito Bateman stays the same, right?
And then currently, just to start with the top, the SGV COG is currently represented. It's currently Yvonne Yu and the alternate's Henry Lo. Is there anyone who – let me ask actually first.
Yvonne and Henry, are you guys still willing to stay on or willing to give this up to give other people an opportunity to learn a little bit more about the COG?
Or work with the COG?
I mean, I'm flexible if I'm here. A colleague wants to hold a seat.
Well, the way the COG is also constituted is that even if you're not, say, a full board member, you can still sit on some of the policy committees. like transportation or homelessness. And so, am I right? I mean, you don't have to necessarily be the current appointed or the alternate. You can still, if you wish to be on a policy committee, let them know.
Yeah, but we would still need, they would be the designated person for the actual board for the COG. So it's whoever wants that to go to those, I think, 4 o'clock in the afternoon.
I know, in Monrovia, yes.
In Monrovia.
Yes, in Monrovia. 4 o'clock in the afternoon in Monrovia. What day? Well, it depends. It depends because...
Thursday, sorry. Well, it depends because some...
For example, transportation, I believe, meets on Tuesdays.
It depends. You would have to look the full schedule. I go sometimes.
But again, yes, it's in Monrovia, yes.
So I'm hearing that you guys wish to stay on. Is that right?
Well, does one of you want to... Again, our friend is, do one of you want to do it?
I mean, sounds like... No?
No, I was just, I was just playing like devil's advocate. I mean, if someone else wanted to do it.
Well, no, no, no, no, no, no. Because at the same time, I do realize that we have
three new council members, well, not new, but, you know what I mean. I mean, but I'm just saying, if you want to, again, I'm more than happy to.
Yes?
Yvonne, are you staying as a rep? Yes, because I don't think the rest,
I already sit on the rest of the rest. Okay, and so, Henry, you'll stay as an alternate? Sure. Okay.
I actually realized I skipped the whole first section, so.
I'm going to go back to the Board of Education. And I jotted down that we kept the other one the same,
but you're keeping track of these as well, right?
So Board of Education,
is there anyone who wants to work with the school districts? And I know that we also, along with just Alhambra, we also have other school districts as well within the city.
I do. I'd be happy to do you guys. Do you guys want to stay on?
I would like to stay on just because I'm,
I feel like I'm working with you.
And then anyone want to be an alternate?
I can be an alternate, but if you want to be an alternate, that's okay.
You can be an alternate, too.
I mean, again, I have other ties to some of the school districts as well,
so I don't necessarily have to.
So then we'll be the alternate?
Yes. All right.
So then we'll go ahead and head to California Contract Cities Association.
I went to their conference earlier.
Everyone kept asking me, did you bring Yvonne with you?
Yvonne, do you want to stay on?
Yvonne, can you mind, what time do they meet?
They don't really meet.
They just go to their events.
Oh, they have events? Oh, I see. And in conference, they will have a meeting after conference.
Okay. I see.
Are you interested in staying on, or is anyone else interested in...
I stay on because a lot of times no one wants it.
Oh, okay.
I don't mind doing that one.
I kind of enjoyed going to that one.
All right, so I'll join, I'll be the representative for California Contract Cities, and then alternate.
Yvonne, do you want to be an alternate?
Okay, Yvonne will be the alternate.
For reference, there is a list of meeting times for the general meetings, right? So for California Contract Cities Association, it looks like their directors' meetings are typically held on the third Wednesday of each month at 6 p.m.
Correct, there is additional conferences.
Oh, during our conference?
Yeah, it happens during our city council meetings every, yeah, if it's third, third Wednesday.
Does that mean I can't come to the council meetings?
No, I'm just, yeah, just letting you know that there's a page there that gives you the times and the dates.
Okay, thank you for that.
All right.
So ICA, it's currently Henry Lo and myself, Independent Cities.
Is anyone interested in doing that one? Or Henry, are you willing to stay on?
Yeah, sure.
If no one else wants it, yes.
If no one else wants it.
Okay. And then alternate?
I'll stay with Henry.
Okay.
All right.
I'm currently League of California Cities, but since I just joined California contracts,
does anyone want?
I'm happy to take the league unless someone else is interested in it. I actually got appointed by one of the caucuses for the league to the League of California Cities and Environmental Quality Committee. So I'll be at most of those meetings anyway.
Okay.
Unless someone really wants it, I don't need it.
Okay, so Henry.
You can have it because actually I am currently on the board of the LGBT caucus for the league, So I'm involved anyway, you know, and then in the past through the league, through the caucus, I've also been also appointed to their policy committee. So I don't necessarily have to hold the alternative because I'm already involved with the league.
I'm already out.
So then Thomas, representative, and then we'll make Vin the alternate since Henry is already on a board seat anyway.
All right. LA sanitation will stay.
We have a mayoral switch next month. So that will be Thomas and Vin.
And then we did COG already.
So the SGV Economic Partnership, it's currently Thomas.
Thomas, do you want to stay on?
Yeah, happy to stay on. I go there anyway for my day job.
Unless someone else wants to or is interested in doing it?
No?
Okay.
And Vin, do you want to stay on as the alternate? I'd be happy to if no one else wants to. If someone else wants to, I'll give it up.
Okay. Then I'll go for Thomas.
When do they when do they meet Wednesdays? Well, oh this bad. They yeah, their board meetings are every other month
Uh, but I don't think we the city doesn't have a board member
But there are monthly committee meetings for the ledger, right? They're led to me that they have a Wednesdays, right?
Okay, so
Then you'll stay alternate
Okay, and then joseph leon's doing that we tom i mean, uh, ben and I are doing sister city
the SCAG. Thomas, you're currently on the SCAG. Do you want to give it up for someone?
I'm happy to stay on unless someone else really wants it. But I am on...
Oh, thank you for pointing that out.
For what?
You can take the LAX.
You can take the LAX roundtable or the SCAG.
I would say just for SCAG, I am appointed to the transportation committee, so one of the policy committees for SCAG. So I would prefer to be the representative and stay there, but I'm happy to give something
up.
But Thomas, do you have to be the representative to still be on this because you're already
appointed to?
I am not clear on that, actually.
Just to give other people an opportunity to join.
I just recently was offered an appointment on the SCAG as well. So I'm willing to, I was actually really interested in the SCAG, but I think that would already give me an opportunity to be part of SCAG.
So I don't need to be the representative.
But if someone else is interested, Vin, are you interested in being in the SCAG?
Yeah, actually, I don't think I need to be the delegate for the SCAG General Assembly, which is, I think, what we're appointing to be on the policy committee.
Do you want to try it? Unless I'm mistaken. All right. So then it'll be the SCAG.
And actually, they mean downtown.
So it's actually not too far from.
Do you want to be the alternate?
Well, to be clear, so the SCAG appointment here is for us to appoint a delegate for the General Assembly, which is their conference in May. That's the only meeting you have to go to. The policy committees are appointed separately. So I'm appointed through the COG to the Transportation Committee.
I'm not sure.
Jose might be a presidential appointment or someone else for SCAG. but the those are that's separate from what we're appointing today those are different so you don't The point we're talking about today is really just for the May conference that they have yeah
You have a main meeting just block off me
Okay, excellent, and then
Someone want to serve as alternate Henry you interested in doing sky as an alternate mean yeah, okay
All right. And then, Henry, since we have you, LAX Roundtable, you are the representative?
Sure. Unless someone wants it.
I'm interested in it just because I know that in my district, we get a lot of air traffic.
I mean, you've been the alternate. And again, you know, the one good thing about the Roundtable is that they meet on Zoom.
They meet on Zoom. And even after the pandemic, they continue to meet on Zoom.
otherwise we'd have to drive to LAX for these meetings.
And then so...
I might just jump on a flight.
Well, actually, what's interesting is that one reason why we meet on Zoom
is because, I guess, pre-pandemic, they met third Wednesdays. And I said, well, wait a minute, that's when we have council meetings. And I made it very clear. I said, look, I mean, if you go back to in person, that means effectively we can't send anyone to your meetings because they would be in the evenings and they'd be at LAX. And so luckily they, you know, kept it on Zoom meetings so that, you know.
When do they meet?
They met today.
They meet third Wednesdays from 1.30 to whenever they finish their business. And I understand that, you know, we're members because of the issue of the noise over when planes are turning around. But it's a regional organization, so we actually, our membership also consists of people from the San Fernando Valley,
communities right next to LAX, South Bay.
And so it depends.
I would say that in terms of the responsibilities, it depends on the agenda.
I mean, I do go to every meeting, but like today's agenda, most of this question will center around flights around San Fernando Valley and then also air taxis
which is not an issue yet for our community
maybe by 2025 or 2026
but air taxis yes air taxis
actually I think I fight in the first year I fight really hard to change the path with LAX but ended up they said no they decide not to change and so it just spent a whole year of nothing
And then I think our previous former mayor also fight hard for many years, but there's nothing.
So we need new voice. We need new voice to continue to fight.
If I could also add, at least at the time, FAA was actually not in a position to even talk to the roundtable
because there were lawsuits that had not been settled. And until they had been settled, they actually couldn't even talk to us. And so we at least now have FAA representatives at each meeting.
And all I can say is that it, I still think it's important to have, you know.
Sure. Okay, sure, sure. Sure.
Sure, if you want to.
All right. All right. So I think we've got this result.
So for LAX, no changes?
No changes. Okay.
Do you want us to reread the list quickly so that it's clear?
Or you guys, we have it. I think we have it. We have it? Okay. Okay. We will. We will send it.
Actually, at least for me, can we make sure, I think there are no changes, right?
I mean, pretty much, I guess if there's anything that requires me to file like a W-2,
it's because some of the pay stipends, I've actually had to forego them. And so I just need to, if I need to file a W-2, I need to know, because, we're talking about Carl, because of my day job, I've had to basically forego, I don't get paid for any of these meetings, but I forgot stipends so that we've addressed some of the issues regarding my vote.
Yeah. Yes, yes, thank you. Yes.
If you want to, I mean, but yeah.
Okay, so we need a motion to approve all of these.
So moved.
All right, seconded by me. If we can take a quick vote.
Approved unanimously.
Excellent. Thank you.
All right.
Being mindful that we have 15 minutes left.
We're going to...
Council Member. We're going to move to, we already did, 5-5-B. 5-C. Thank you, Mr. Mayor, members of the Council. 5-C is the City Manager's Contract. There is a revised contract on the dais and there are extra copies available for the public up next to the agenda over by the folks that are nicely sitting over there as we end this. This just has some technical things in it. I am required by the Government Code to highlight the
the substantive parts of this agreement as the council is aware this was negotiated
right before christmas and we're bringing it forward tonight for approval this approves a
base salary of 265 000 beginning november 15th 2023 a 600 month car allowance and substantially
similar benefits as the rest of the executive management employees for a total package of
approximately $325,000 for the first year. There is a provision in the contract that would allow for negotiation of an increase in the base salary on or about January 1st, 2025, following an evaluation. As you know, Ms. Alvarez has served the city since 2018. Her resume is attached to the staff report. I'm happy to answer any questions. And of course, the city manager who you appointed in November is sitting right here for any additional questions. Happy to.
Thank you for that brief report, Cora. Are there any brief questions or comments?
Council Member Go? Okay.
Motion to approve. Seconded by Council Member Yu, if we can take a quick vote.
Approved unanimously.
Excellent. Congratulations on your new contract.
We'll go ahead and jump to city communications.
Being mindful of picking perhaps that we have 13 minutes left.
So that gives us on average about two minutes per person.
So we'll start with Council Member Lo.
Let me get my timer on. You guys turn off my mic while I'm talking too long.
Okay.
You know what? Happy New Year, everyone.
and you know it was great to start the year by attending our mayor's state of city and it was actually a packed room and great to just you know report to community what we've accomplished this past year under the mayor's term last week I joined many of you here at the Brazil Lindsay Center dinner and you know it was just great to see people in our community and survivors do what they
They love to just dance and sing. You know, at least some of us were singing.
Also last weekend I attended an event by Brandon Say at his family's dance studio. Again an observance of the anniversary of the January 21st shooting and then also just excited by all the great progress we're making in the parks. I attended with many of you the Sequoia Park dedication. And, you know, this weekend certainly is going to be very emotionally in control of us
because it's the one-year anniversary.
And, you know, what went through my head was the vigil. And also I was thinking, you know, Saturday we're also doing the bulky cleanup. And it also made me think about our former colleague, Fred Sinoso,
because one thing a friend I used to do was drive around in his truck to pick up bulky stuff.
And, you know, I guess I might do that this Saturday myself. If anyone wants to join me driving around looking for bulky stuff to pick up.
Really? Oh, yeah. Okay, yeah, yeah, yeah.
Yeah, let's take your truck and we'll pick up stuff, you know.
All right.
I know. Shocking, right? Happy New Year, everyone. Last week I attended a lot of events with Council Member Lo.
I attended Brendan's Day, our hero, to host a dance party at the Light Light Dance Studio to celebrate a one-year anniversary of surviving the mass shooting. And Brendan is our forever hero, and I will try my best to participate in all his events. He's such a humble young man and is always proud of his self-braveness efforts to save so many lives. And the same week, Chinatown Service Center and also holds a resilient center dinner, I think, with our healing fund. Over 100 people attend, and all five council members, we sit at the same table.
City attorney, like, yeah, worry so much. Along with our staff, we're singing and dancing, and we have a solo, we have a group song, and I heard people receive our tape recorder, I mean, video as well. Our mayor also presents the state of the city. addressed last week and provide a summary of what we achieved, I mean, mostly he, achieved last year and sharing his visions of the coming year. Good job, Mayor. That's it for me.
All right, so my turn. It's a new year, so a happy new year to many folks out there, and new years are new beginnings, and for our city, that's definitely a new beginning. what was old is now gone we're recovering, we're healing, we're moving forward and one of the most important things that we'll do this year will be January 21st on the memorial as we proceed and plot a path forward for a city
for the last, it seems like, what, two weeks now
there's been many, many events started with the CCBA installation of new officers flag raising in Chinatown Then we actually had a League of California City meeting in the Edison building right by Costco. We opened two new restaurants, grand opening, ribbon cutting, yummy kitchen, and wonton king right next to each other on a Saturday. That was probably one of the better opening ceremonies that I've seen in our city in a long, long time. We also attended the Chinese American military support group. We had a dinner at NBC, and it was good to see all the military and their families supporting our city from the local cities in attendance. We did the ribbon cutting at Sequoia Park. We attended the mayor's state of the city address. Good job, mayor, and I would say the rest of the city staff for getting us through last year and accomplishing so much. We also attended the Resiliency Center dinner on NBC, and that was about 125, 130 people. But the best part was karaokeing with city staff and elected officials. That will be video forever. That in itself is epic. We also attended Brandon Tsai's Community Remembrance Fair, which was last week. Great to see Brandon kind of holding the community together and for the local elected officials to come and support a very, very important issue about mental health. And then yesterday morning, we welcomed the kids at Inesco. They did the city hall visits, the fourth graders, got a chance to talk to them and welcome them. And I think we have a lot of smart kids in that group who will continue to be sitting here one day. So that is all for me.
Attended many of the same events. Very enjoyable. Appreciate it. Just want to wish everyone a happy new year.
I know we're off to a great start.
A lot of activity and looking forward to a very productive year with my council colleagues and the staff. Appreciate you guys sticking it out. And Nancy sticking it out for a late night, our first meeting of the year.
Just a quick question for staff.
For the vigil, if anyone's still watching, welcome anyone to join us for the vigil happening this Sunday night. Activities are going to start around 5 o'clock, although the vigil starts at 6 just outside the lawn. As was mentioned earlier, rain or shine. Hope the community will come together for this moment to remember the one-year anniversary of the tragic mass shooting that happened here in Monterey Park.
Have we publicized?
We're going to continue to publicize that event and the vigil right through social media channels
Yes, we will.
And then that's all I got.
Hope we can get home soon.
Thank you. Being mindful of time, not just ours, but everyone here has families to get to as well
and want to get some sleep.
I just wanted to also echo a lot of the same events that we attended. I definitely highlight was being able to sing karaoke with the entire council without having to discuss any city business or violate the Brown Act. So we did not because we were just singing the entire time. And also highlight was yesterday with council member Ngo, we were able to greet a lot of our fourth graders and promote civic engagement within our city. to councilmember Ngo's point I think there's a lot of really bright and inquisitive kids in that group who are very interested in being here so I wanted to thank staff because I know that takes an enormous amount of planning and and work Diana and and everyone else but Parks and Rec fire I got a chance to go with the group that went to the fire department most of the kids had never been to the fire department or been in there just their faces and you know We're glowing and so excited to be there.
Great to see civic engagement in action.
So very appreciative of the efforts that we've done this year
to engage our local schools and our students.
Hope that's something that we continue to do, just always. And so lastly, just very appreciative of also the staff
and all the work that we did.
I know at the State of the City, I did want to focus the State of the City on the amazing work that we've done in the last year, but more importantly the amazing work that you've done in the last year. And I think sometimes we go underappreciated, but if there was ever a time to appreciate our staff, it has been last year for all the amazing work that you do,
not just to get us through that troubling time period,
but also to continue to do the city's work in a very amazing way. And so I really appreciate all of you.
And if it wasn't clear during the state of the city,
I just wanted to focus that time on you guys and everything that you did and and lastly chief Halleck
we're gonna
Miss you and I just wanted to end on that note that we really appreciate you and we wish you the best on That note, we'll go ahead and end our council meeting at 11 26 p.m. Have a good evening
Thank you.
Thank you.
Thank you.
Thank you.
Thank you.
Thank you.
Thank you.
Thank you.
Thank you.
Thank you.
Thank you.
Thank you.
We'll be right back.
Thank you.
Thank you.
Thank you.
Thank you.
Thank you.
We'll be right back.
Thank you.
Thank you.
Thank you.
Thank you.
Thank you.
Thank you.
Thank you.
Thank you.
Thank you.
Thank you.
Thank you.
Thank you.
Thank you.
Thank you.
Thank you.
Thank you.
Thank you.
Thank you.
Counciloris